Photograph by Danny Wilcox Frazier/Redux
Published November 11, 2013
It's well known that water has been key to the shale oil and gas rush in the United States. But in one center of the hydraulic fracturing boom—North Dakota—authorities are finding that the initial blast of water to frack the wells is only the beginning.
The wells being drilled into the prairie to tap into the Bakken shale need "maintenance water"—lots of it—to keep the oil flowing. (See related photos: "Bakken Shale Boom Transforms North Dakota.")
So while the water first pumped down the hole to crack rock formations and release the underground oil and natural gas typically totals 2 million gallons (7.5 million liters) per well, each of North Dakota's wells is daily drinking down an average of more than 600 gallons (2,300 liters) in maintenance water, according to recent calculations by North Dakota's Department of Mineral Resources (DMR). (See related quiz: "What You Don't Know About Water and Energy.")
Without water, salt buildup forms and restricts the flow of oil.
Over the life of the well, which authorities presume will be 30 to 40 years, maintenance water needs could add up to 6.6 million to 8.8 million gallons (25 to 33.3 million liters)—or more than three to four times the water required for the initial fracking. (See related story: "Water Demand for Energy to Double by 2035.")
North Dakota DMR Director Lynn Helms addressed the maintenance water issue in a taped address earlier this fall at the annual meeting of the North Dakota Association of Oil and Gas Producing Counties. "What we're beginning to realize is that these . . . wells will need freshwater for maintenance over their life," Helms was quoted as saying in a report on the presentation in the local newspaper, the Dickinson Press.
Helms declined a request for an interview, but DMR geologist Richard Suggs confirmed that the department's calculations show that each well, over its 30- to 40-year lifespan, might end up consuming even more water for maintenance than for the fracking process originally used to create it.
Why do North Dakota's wells have such a difficult-to-quench thirst? The naturally high salinity of the Bakken play's groundwater is the reason, according to Suggs.
"As they're producing the oil, they're also bringing up that water," Suggs said. "The salt precipitates in the well bore. It can restrict the flow of oil, and cause the pumping equipment to have problems as well."
That salt has to be flushed out by pumping fresh water down into the well bore, and then sucking it back up through the same tubing normally used for oil. "The salt basically dissolves in the water, the way a spoonful of table salt would in a glass of water," Suggs said.
The implications for water demand are significant in a state that gets less than 13 inches of rainfall each year in its driest areas, and ranks among the bottom 10 states for precipitation. In 2012, the Bakken oil industry used about 5.5 billion gallons (209 billion liters) of water—more than the amount used by the 110,000 inhabitants of Fargo, the state's biggest city. When the Bakken is fully developed in the next 10 to 20 years, the oil and gas play's 40,000 to 45,000 wells may need to consume roughly double that amount—as much as 10.2 billion gallons per year (28 million gallons each day)-in maintenance water to keep the oil flowing, according to a July 2013 DMR presentation to the North Dakota legislature. (See related story: "Oil Train Revival: North Dakota Relies on Rail to Deliver Its Crude.")
One way to cut down on oil and gas industry water demand in North Dakota would be to recycle and reuse water from the fracking process. But that won't help in well maintenance. Water that's been used for fracking already has picked up too much salt from the underground geological formation to be used for flushing the wells of salt build-up, according to Suggs.
Instead, only freshwater—treated with a biocide to kill bacteria that might harm the oil deposit—can be used. After the maintenance water is withdrawn from the wells, it can then be recycled and used in the initial fracking of another well, or else disposed of in an underground saltwater storage facility.
Helms addressed recycling in his speech to the oil-producing counties group in September: "We're in the process of trying to find a way to recycle . . . produced water safely so that we can use produced water for fracking and save our freshwater resources for maintenance," Helms said, according to the Dickinson Press report.
The need for large amounts of maintenance water seems to be a unique problem in the Bakken play. Both energy industry and environmental groups contacted by National Geographic News said they had not even heard of the practice before. "I'm not familiar with it, and I've worked in different areas," said Andrew Patterson, executive vice president of technical and regulatory affairs for the Marcellus Coalition, a Pittsburgh-based group representing oil and natural gas companies active in developing Pennsylvania's Marcellus shale. "I'm pretty confident that it's not something that you would see in the Marcellus [play]. The brine in the Marcellus is not causing major [salt] precipitation." (See related blog post: "Fracking Water: It's Just So Hard to Clean.")
In North Dakota, Suggs said that the future price and availability of fresh water may well determine how long wells remain economical to operate. "If water becomes too expensive, that might potentially decrease the life of the well," he said.
The future price of water in North Dakota will depend on a number of factors beyond oil and gas industry demand, and the so-far much greater demand of the state's mainstay agricultural industry. North Dakota has a robust industry of private water suppliers who have developed a lucrative business selling water to the fracking industry. These private suppliers raised objections to a state government-backed co-op, the Western Area Water Supply Project, which is building $110 million pipeline, treatment facilities and water depots to boost northwestern North Dakota supplies with water taken from the Missouri River, which flows through the state.
One of the rationales for the project to bring fresh surface water to the region was the health risks of drinking water drawn from the state's groundwater, with its high sodium content. But the government-supported co-op also plans to sell about 20 percent of its water to the fracking industry, which will help keep prices low (and create competition for the private water suppliers).
Steve Mortensen, chairman of the North Dakota Independent Water Providers, the confederation of ranchers and farmers who are private water suppliers, said water availability isn't a problem in the state. "We have plenty of water to serve the industry," he said. "If anything, our business is more threatened by the new technology to reuse water for fracking." Mortensen said the Missouri River has the potential to provide vastly more water than oil drillers would ever need.
But not everyone agrees. Derrick Braaten, a Bismarck attorney who represents farmers and ranchers who are water buyers, said that many in the agriculture sector are worried about whether North Dakota's water supply will accommodate the growing demand. "There's concern about whether we are depleting the aquifers faster than they're going to be able to replenish," he said. (See related quiz: "What You Don't Know About Food, Water, and Energy.")
Its time to evolve and move away from petrol and into new relms of energy and fuel…One should ask? How is it computer technolgy and other technolgies have evolved so rapid but the standard autos are still restricted to 20 mpg… HELLO Were slaves to this industry so nothing will ever add up even if the numbers look good on paper
The average family of 4 uses 400g of water per day, so per well that's like adding 2 households to the state in place of a well. Florida adds 250 households PER-DAY to it's state population. So what's the big deal? I think North Dakota can handle it.
It's ironical that in this huge instance the ability to produce oil depends upon reducing the most important, yet under appreciated commodity of all, water. No matter what the oil industry does to produce more oil there are always huge consequences that are connected. Take a long look at the picture appearing with this article. The oil infrastructure surrounded by puddled water is an ugly thing to behold. Yet it is part of an otherwise majestic landscape. Oil is raping our planet. We are now in the midst of a horrific climate change of weather instability. Smart people are now securing their homes using hurricane clamps and fasteners to hold roofs and and exterior walls in place. Those willing to spend extra on roofing are shingling with steel. Whats happening in the Philippines is the tip of the iceberg regarding what's coming our way.
Instead of flaring the associated natural gas that they are producing it now, they should use it to power a desalination/purification plant to recycle the produced formation brine. This would raise the operating costs somewhat, but it should be feasible.
Ranchers and Farmers that believe that availability of water isn't a problem? Wonder if they will think it's a problem when that salty water starts leeching up into THEIR groundwater....how's the crops and cows gonna like that....
As Bakken or any other shale oil well depletes at 47% per year, a well of a start up of 1,000 bpd, 60 months later is producing 42 bpd and is therefore of little or no value to the producer. The "normal" startup volume is 100 bpd so the financial math makes no sense. Your well life estimate of 30 to 40 years is erroneous as will be the associated water requirements.
@chuck strickland The difference is reusability of the water. When a family uses water, that water returns to the freshwater supply, available for someone else to use. When water is used to frack, it comes up 5+ times saltier than the ocean, and it cannot be added back into the freshwater supply. If you do put it back into that supply, it fouls many many times its own volume.
So, tracking water is removed from the potable water supply forever, irreplaceably.
Strong, L. C., Gould, T., Kasinkas, L., Sadowsky, M. J., Aksan, A., & Wackett, L. P. (2013). Biodegradation in Waters from Hydraulic Fracturing: Chemistry, Microbiology and Engineering. Journal of Environmental Engineering
@chuck strickland This is the same kind of reasoning that Politicians, who are in the pockets of the oil Industry, use to B******* the ignorant public. Stop pretending to be an authority Chuck and look into the eyes of your Children and Grand Children and tell them and yourself, " Everythings going to be ok". We are so so so F***** as a Species.
@Earl Padfield Don't you mean "fleasable"?
That's not my estimate--a ND state department of mineral resources geologist cited that number. The North Dakota Petroleum Council also predicts a 30-year lifespan. http://www.ndoil.org/?id=78&advancedmode=1&category=Bakken+Basics
@Roger McKnight You're right. After almost 10 years of shale development, state and industry data show that shale wells have a 5-6 year lifetime. Not 30 or 100.
You can learn more at ShaleBubble.org
Our Latest News Videos
Recent Energy News
The world's existing power plants are locking in more than 300 billion tons of future emissions that aren't being accounted for, a new study says.
U.S. data centers throw away billions of dollars in electricity every year because of inefficiencies in how they are run, according to a new report.
Under a proposed EPA rule, state officials will have to cut carbon emissions by nearly 45 percent—one of the highest targets in the country.
The Big Energy Question
Join the debate over whether we should view natural gas as a transitional fuel that eventually gives way to renewables, or whether it is blocking the way forward.
From better mass transit to a stronger mix of renewable energy, what is the most important thing we can do to make cities smarter when it comes to energy use?
As shipping and energy activity increase in the region, what do we urgently need to learn more about? Vote and comment on the list.
The Great Energy Challenge
The Great Energy Challenge is an important National Geographic initiative designed to help all of us better understand the breadth and depth of our current energy situation.