This is an beautiful creature. It deserves our help, as do many others. Turtles have a soft spot in my heart, thank you for what you do. May this turtle recover and continue to prosper.
Photograph from Vietnam News Agency/AFP/Getty Images
Published July 1, 2013
In June, researchers collected eggs from the last mating pair of the critically endangered Yangtze giant softshell turtle (Rafetus swinhoei) in the hopes that at least one will be fertile.
The 220-pound (100-kilogram) freshwater giant, which spends most of its life burrowing in mud, was once common in its namesake Yangtze River, China's Lake Taihu and Yunnan Province, and parts of Vietnam.
By the late 1990s, however, human encroachment and poaching for use of the shells in Chinese traditional medicine rapidly depleted the population. Now, a total of four animals are known—two wild males in Vietnam and the mating pair at Suzhou Zoo.
It's the team's sixth year of breeding the turtles at the zoo, which is not far from Shanghai. So far, none of the eggs have hatched.
Researchers can't pinpoint the reason for the infertility, but they suspect a combination of factors, including poor sperm quality due to the male's age—roughly a hundred—an improper mating posture, and stress on the female.
Because the turtles are the last in captivity and too much human interaction could kill them, sperm samples cannot be taken nor tests run. Still, scientists are hoping that this year will be the lucky one. (Related: "Pictures: Turtles Hunted, Traded, Squeezed Out of Their Habitats.")
"The resurrection of this iconic species in the wild, the largest freshwater turtle in the world, would be a symbol of hope," said Gerald Kuchling, founder of the Australia-based group Turtle Conservancy and a turtle-reproduction expert.
As is the case with many near-extinct species, by the time scientists realized the extent of the turtle's decline, the species was almost gone.
In 2006, the U.S. nonprofit Turtle Survival Alliance asked Kuchling to establish the sex of the last three captive giant softshell turtles in China, which at the time lived at the Shanghai Zoo, Suzhou Zoo, and Suzhou's West Garden Buddhist Temple. (Related: "6 of Nature's Loneliest Animals Looking for Love.")
When Kuchling landed in China in 2007, the Shanghai Zoo and Buddhist Temple individuals had already died. The Suzhou Zoo male was the last known Chinese survivor. Researchers sent an all-points bulletin to every zoo in the nation in the off chance a turtle had been misidentified.
Their call was answered: A photograph of a turtle at the Changsha Zoo looked promising. Kuchling, along with Lu Shunqing, China director for the Wildlife Conservation Society, traveled to Changsha, where they confirmed it was a Yangtze giant softshell—and a female to boot.
"It's a bit miraculous we found her," said Emily King, the Suzhou Zoo breeding program's field assistant.
Although moving the Changsha Zoo's female—the younger of the pair at then 80 years old—to the Suzhou Zoo was risky because of the stress it would cause the animal, zoo officials and researchers had no choice.
Surveys in the wild consistently had turned up no Yangtze giant softshells aside from the two males already known in Vietnam. These individuals haven't been captured because catching and transporting them could be fatal.
Either the Suzhou Zoo pair would mate, or the species would go extinct.
In May 2008, after much red tape, the female finally arrived in Suzhou. Just over a week later, the turtles mated-despite the fact that the female had likely never met a male. (Also see "Mating Turtles Fossilized in the Act.")
A month later, the female laid her first clutch of 45 eggs on the zoo enclosure's beach, 32 of which were incubated.
To determine if an egg is fertile, the scientists candle them, or hold a candle behind the egg to look for a developing embryo.
The initial batch yielded no hatchlings. Later that month, a second batch was equally infertile.
The turtles mated each of the following years, but with the same result.
Di Min, a zoologist at the Suzhou Zoo, said when the program started there was talk about assisted reproductive techniques, a kind of "turtle IVF."
"But the best and safest is they breed naturally. There's only this pair—if we lose one, especially the female, we don't have any chance."
The team doesn't know how much longer the zoo turtles will live or continue to mate, but scientists suspect Yangtze giant softshells can live well over a hundred years. (See more photos of aquatic species.)
Turtle Team Optimistic
Despite these setbacks, scientists are staying optimistic about saving the turtle.
"We have these two [Suzhou] animals, and hopefully in the very near future, as opposed to far distant, we'll have baby Rafetuses on our hands," added field assistant King.
"In one shape or another, the program will go on, because everyone is invested in having this species continue."
Like most readers, I wish the success for this species lineage to continue.
That being said, I find it alarming that the two wild males are allowed to stay in the wild for fear of "catching and transporting them could be fatal". Wouldn't it be potentially fatal for the species for humans to rely on the sperm of one male, which may have infertile sperm to begin with? As a turtle conservationist, I would take my chances catching these wild males, even with the chances of injuring or killing them. If they remain in the wild, then they will live a life of many more dangers (pollution, water traffic, poaching, etc...) and not adding to any propagation efforts for this species. If they survive these complications, they die of old age and contribute nothing to the survival of their species. The procreation attempts of these wild males may prove to be the "trump" card that we all are hoping for.
I understand there is little say in the matter, but the clock is ticking and all the cards are on the table, so I hope we pull out all the stops and do what's right to prevent extinction.
@Andrew Badje Possibly bad use of the phrase "pull out", but point well taken. I agree with you. Not enough options to chance it.
In Catemaco, Veracruz there are a number of camps formed by volunteers that help to protect the eggs that many turtle species lay each year on the shores of this place. This is just a display of the great work that these people do.Watch "When the Turtle Cries"
I know this is probably clear to most of you, but these turtles are just a symbol. There are things on this earth that we can't get back.
Everything on this earth has to die eventually, but I hope that our legacy as a species is to preserve the beauty of this earth. It was, after all, here for billions of years before we even really came around. It would be such a shame for us to destroy it and leave it as our depleted junk yard. Maybe someone is out there in the cosmos, observing us. I think they'd be disappointed with the way we treat our streams, our oceans, and the other souls born into this floating rock that we call earth, hurtling around in a vast sea of darkness. For all we know, these animals might be our only friends, and we're killing them.
@James O'Gorman Wow! Seriously about as close as one can get to my own views as possible. I often think if there is life out there intelligent enough to have found a way to bridge the enormous gaps in the cosmos, and they are observing us, they must be looking on in some kind of sadness for what we are doing and hoping, just like we are for these turtles, that we can turn it around before it's too late. We are capable of so much if we would just strive to meet our potential. Hopefully compassion rules the future rather than greed and anthropocentrism.
Special Ad Section
Video of the Day
Tigers are secretive by nature, making it difficult to estimate their populations. See how the Wildlife Conservation Society employs an ingenious solution.