National Geographic Daily News
3 comments
Sharon W
Sharon W

What a one-sided article. Darwin's theory is still fundamentally flawed due to the lack of existence of undisputed transitional fossils.

One needs to engage in research which reflects the truth and not merely to buttress a failing theory.

The 'missing link's for myriad of reasons certainly do not dispel the 'most obvious and gravest objection' to evolution. The 'missing link's actually aid in further proving the fallacy that is evolution.

Have a look at '15 questions for evolutionists by Creation Ministries as well as a wealth of information which provides a more accurate view

Peter Brown
Peter Brown

In 1955, A. S. Brink argued in the journal Palaeontologia Africana that that Thrinaxodon had whiskers. In 1961, Richard Estes refuted his argument, to the complete satisfaction of the scientific community, in a paper in the Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. No scientist since has argued for Thrinaxodon whiskers or fur. In the popular media, however, the idea refused to go away. National Geographic should not be perpetuating this long-abandoned view.

Ian Stimson
Ian Stimson

@Sharon W genetics more than conclusively proves evolution, however even if genetics didn't there are literally hundreds of thousands of fossils of transitional species now, to the point that listing them all is absurd. this very article gave you 5 which are not disputed by any evolutionary biologist or palaeontologist


From the Archives

Trending News

Newsletters

Connect With Nat Geo

Shop National Geographic

    SHOP NOW »

    Sustainable Earth

    More »