"I take a nice drinking glass, rotate it clockwise, and slide it down a counter," he said. "Everyone thinks that it will go to the right. That's the natural reaction from curling.
"But it goes to the left, and the initial reaction [from curlers] is that I'm performing some kind of magic trick."
Indeed, Olympian Rojeski did not know that his expert spins present an apparent physics mystery.
"I've never sat down and thought about it," he said. "I bet if you talk to the average curler, nine out of ten people would be unaware of it."
So why does the stone curl the "wrong" way?
Shegelski believes that the answer lies in wet friction, courtesy of a thin layer of meltwater that temporarily forms under the stone.
But testing his theory presented its own share of problems.
"When I'm talking about a thin film, I mean a really thin film" of meltwater, he explained.
"There's no way to measure it directly. If you turn a curling rock on its side, you're not going to see" a puddle on the ice.
Lacking a way to observe the watery film, Shegelski and fellow physicist Erik Jensen recruited volunteers at their local curling club and created a precise under-ice grid system to help track the stones' movement.
They then filmed a variety of shots from an overhead angle using a suspended video camera.
Their data provided a likely explanation.
When a glass or other spinning object slides along a surface, its forward edge holds the highest frictional force.
Thus, when a moving stone is rotating clockwise, it's front edge moves to the right. Sideways friction should cause the object's path to angle, or curl, to the left.
But that extremely thin layer of melted water changes the effect of friction on the stone. It creates better lubrication, and therefore reduced friction, at the front edge.
The sideways friction on the stone's rear edgewhere the meltwater has already refrozendominates the stone's curl instead and makes it move in the opposite direction.
The results are experimentalthey don't definitively prove that meltwater is creating wet friction responsible for the stone's spin.
But theories that don't involve wet friction seem unable to explain the experimental results.
John Williamson, a retired ice technician from Clintonville, Wisconsin, knows the science of the sport as well as anyone.
For years he prepared ice for curling matches by tracking a myriad of variables, such as humidity levels, dew points, and temperatures at different positions all over and above the ice.
He also prepared surfaces with tiny drops of water called pebble, which are sprayed on the ice to control friction.
Williamson believes the friction created when the stone moves over the pebbled surface is key to creating the meltwater and subsequent asymmetry that is responsible for the stone's unusual trajectory.
"If Jenson and Shegelski are rightand I think they arewhat makes the rock curl [the 'wrong' way] is that asymmetry," he said. "There's meltwater at the front of the rock and not at the back."
Williamson explained that, among those curlers who did ponder the reasons behind the curl, the research was welcome.
"There were a lot of arguments going on, because after 500 years nobody could totally understand why these stones curled as they did," he said. "Nobody could get it down to a science."
Shegelski has returned to his day job studying quantum mechanics, leaving some curling mysteries unexplained.
"It's hard to understand why curling rocks curl as much as they do," he said.
"If they only curled half as much it wouldn't be hard to understand. There's at least one mystery that I don't think we've found the answer to."
Free Email News Updates
Sign up for our Inside National Geographic newsletter. Every two weeks we'll send you our top stories and pictures (see sample).
SOURCES AND RELATED WEB SITES