What are national forests for? A faithful political conservative on most matters, Furnish wants "to manage forests for values like wildlife and recreation." Economics back him up: Whether fishing or camping or touring, visitors now account for 78 percent of the national forests' contribution to the overall economy, according to a 2000 Department of Agriculture report. Logging has slipped to only 12 percent.
Furnish offers a way to have both visitors and timber, minus fire: He started demonstration plots in the 1990s to show how loggers can thin second-growth forests, leaving the large trees and using new lumber technologies to get the most out of smaller ones. [Indeed, the market for old-growth timber is declining. Few mills can still handle the big logs, as thick as 50 inches (127 centimeters), but political pressure to cut old growth persists.]
- Author Sebastian Junger on His Trials by Wildfire
- Study Links Logging With Severity of Forest Fires
- Scientists Improve Wildfire Forecasts for Western United States
- Women Smokejumpers: Fighting Fires, Stereotypes
- Firefighter-Author on Battling Colorado Blazes, Scandal
- Photographer-Firefighter on Attacking Wildfires
Furnish wants to see forest habitats preserved, not just for that feathered political football, the spotted owl, but for whole ecosystems, including vulnerable salmon streams. Take away the big trees, he says, "and you're taking away the engine that God built."
Geo-savvy tips: To see what a ponderosa forest should look like, check out the one that the logging town of Condon, Montana, created around its Swan visitor center (406-754-3137). In Yellowstone, take a ranger-led tour of the open, now flourishing areas burned in '88. For a taste of logging traditions, many of which are themselves endangered, visit Libby, Montana, next July for Logger Days (406-293-4167).
A Lighter Footprint on Land?
Cruise Ships Alter Course
Cruise lines over the years have garnered numerous headlines about pollution at sea. Royal Caribbean, for instance, paid hefty fines in 1998 and 1999 for discharging oily bilge water. While dumping incidents may still occur, Royal Caribbean, Carnival, and many of the other lines have done much to clean up their act at sea, often adopting environmental safeguards far more stringent than the law requires.
The record on land, though, is not so stellar. Cruise ships habitually pour hundreds of people onto small islands and towns with little thought given to the consequences. Onshore excursion companies are one area of concern. A cruise passenger on a snorkel excursion near Tahiti, for instance, reported how the local guides tried to amuse their clients by breaking off bits of living coral and tossing a hapless octopus through the air. The cruise line's response when notified of the abuses: "We have no control over local companies."
Royal Caribbean and Carnival may be about to change that. Working with Conservation International, the lines have agreed to a new initiative that will develop and apply environmental guidelines to onshore excursion operators. After all, says Royal Caribbean senior vice president Captain William Wright, "the product on which we base our business is a clean ocean and pristine islands."
Passengers should cheer this effort and help out by reporting irresponsible shore-excursion companies. As Captain Wright says, "Guests clearly play a role."
|
SOURCES AND RELATED WEB SITES
|


