Ian Tattersall, curator in the department of anthropology at American Museum of Natural History in New York, New York, said he is confident the authors made a solid observation about the match between ER 1470 and H. habilis but it is not proof.
"Too bad that the Homo habilis type is a mandible and this is a maxilla [upper jaw], because if OH 7 and ER 1470 are the same thing, then habilis and rudolfensis would indeed be synonyms," he said.
Blumenschine and his colleagues also suggest that several other fossils currently assigned to H. habilis are misfits because of smaller brain sizes and other details and should therefore be renamed. "What we are arguing is a reshuffling of specimens," said Blumenschine.
Tattersall says claims that a new fossil find will cause a reshuffling of the deck are "de riguer" among those who make a living out of digging up old artifacts and bones but are not prudent.
"When Leaky was working at Olduvai in 1960 and thereabouts, it may have been possible to make such a claim. But the hominid fossil record is now so big that it is unlikely that any one fossil will totally revolutionize interpretation," he said.
Tools and Butchered Bones
Blumenschine and colleagues were in Tanzania as part of a multi-year, multi-disciplinary program to figure out the adaptive strategies the early hominids evolved in order to survive over the entire area of the Olduvai Lake Basin.
Earlier research suggested that the hominids spent most of their time on the eastern side of the lake, which lay closer to the volcanic highlands, a major source of freshwater.
Blumenschine and Charles Peter, a co-author of the paper and researcher at the University of Georgia in Athens, hypothesized that the hominids might occasionally migrate to the lake basin's drier western side during wetter periods.
The research team was excavating trenches on the western side of the gorge when they unexpectedly found the hominid fossil in 1995 along with stone tools and bones from larger animals that have marks made by stone knives and hammers.
"Most of the stone tools were made from material that can be found locally near the western gorge, but a few tools were made of material derived from the volcanic highlands to the east," said Blumenschine.
This is evidence, he said, that the hominids carried some of their tools with them as they trekked 12 to 16 miles (20 to 25 kilometers) around the lake, which fits in with the researchers' general models of how the early hominids used the lake.
"Such a migratory, resource- and shelter-based pattern indicates behavioral flexibility and an adaptable lifestyle of these early Homo people," said Phillip Tobias, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa, in an accompanying perspective in Science.
More Information About Human Origins
Documentary Redraws Human's Family Tree
Fossil Implies Our Early Kin Lived in Trees, Study Says
Controversy Over Famed Ancient Skull: Ape or Human?
Skull Fossil Opens Window Into Early Period of Human Origins
Skull Fossil Challenges Out-of-Africa Theory
New Study Supports Idea That Primates, Dinosaurs Coexisted
Human Fossil Adds Fuel to Evolution Debate
Did Our Species Mate With Other Human Species?
Did Humans and Neandertals Battle for Control of the Middle East?
Killer Cats Hunted Human Ancestors
Adolescence Came Late in Human Evolution, Study Shows
Viewpoint: Is It Time to Revise the System of Scientific Naming?
African Bone Tools Dispute Key Idea About Human Evolution
Africa's Imperiled Rock Art Documented Before it Disappears
Bones, Tools Push Back Human Settlement in Arctic Region
Oldest Asian Tools Show Early Human Tolerance of Variable Climate
Telltale Face Betrays Neandertals as Non-Human
Fossils From Ethiopia May Be Earliest Human Ancestor
New Face Added to Humankind's Family Tree
Discoveries Breathe New Life into Human Origins Debate
Additional National Geographic Resources
Interactive Feature: Outpost: In Search of Human Origins
National Geographic magazine online: Who Were the First Americans?
SOURCES AND RELATED WEB SITES