for National Geographic News
Forty years ago Rachel Carson, a writer and marine biologist,
published Silent Spring, a book documenting the chemical warfare
that human beings were waging on the natural world. The book is widely
credited with launching today's environmental movement.
The "silent spring" was her metaphor for the destruction humans were wreaking on their environment.
As she saw it, a small American town, the farms prosperous, the people healthy and happy, the forests teeming with wildlifeall was silenced, or sickened by a mysterious illness brought on by the people themselves. The "strange blight" was caused by the unexamined and virtually unregulated practice of dumping, spraying, dusting, and otherwise distributing harmful chemicals into the environment.
The chemical industry, government scientists, and the media attacked Carson as a hysterical woman; her facts were called inaccurate, her competency questioned. But her book became a best-seller.
Reviewing the book in 1962, Time magazine joined the crowd, questioning the book's accuracy and the validity of her conclusions; several decades later, the magazine named her one of the 100 most influential people of the 20th century.
Are we better off since Carson opened the eyes of Americans to the destruction being wreaked on nature?
"I think we are better off in the sense that this is known to be a problem and there is some regulation and even prohibition in some cases," said Thomas E. Lovejoy, chief biodiversity adviser for the World Bank and chair of the Conservation Trust Advisory Board of the National Geographic Society.
"Better off than we would have been," he added. "But we continue to introduce new chemicals to the environment, even new categories of threats, and pre-test them insufficiently. And almost nothing is being done to look at combined and possibly synergistic effects."
Monday, April 22, is Earth Day 2002, and the planet's problems are legion. Research and political maneuvering in recent decades suggest that now, more than ever, revisiting Rachel Carson may be imperative.
Carson was the first to introduce the general public to the concept of persistent bioaccumulative toxinssubstances that are long lasting, move readily from land to air and water, and can build up in the food chain to levels that are harmful to humans, wildlife, and the environment. These compounds can be found everywherein herbicides, pesticides, insecticides, detergents, plastics, and even cosmetics.
When Carson wrote her book, toxicity testing of new chemical compounds was limited to figuring out whether exposure to a chemical at high concentrations would cause cancer. Since then, scientists have discovered a previously unsuspected threat posed by many synthetic chemicals: the ability to disrupt the body's internal chemical messaging systems.
Even at very low levels of exposure, these so-called endocrine-disrupting chemicals can alter sexual, neurological, and behavioral development, impair reproduction, and undermine immune systems. It's not merely a question of dying young; research suggests that some of these chemicals could leave generations of people with subtly impaired intellectual functioning, reduced fertility, and weakened immune systems.
SOURCES AND RELATED WEB SITES