Hong Kong—the world’s largest retail market for elephant ivory—says it may now consider banning its ivory trade.
Hong Kong is also a major transit hub for illegal ivory, much of it bound for mainland China, the world’s largest consumer of smuggled ivory. With some 30,000 African elephants being killed every year for their ivory, a decision by Hong Kong to shut down its domestic trade would be significant.
Hong Kong is at the heart of the ivory black market.
“The Government is open-minded on the ban on domestic trade” was how a spokesperson for Hong Kong’s Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) put it in an email to the South China Morning Post.
The government’s statement follows the release last week of a report by WildAid, an international non-governmental organization that aims to eliminate illegal wildlife trade, together with undercover video by independent investigators provided to WildAid and WWF-Hong Kong, detailing how Hong Kong’s legal ivory market fuels ivory smuggling and elephant poaching.
Hong Kong is at the heart of the ivory black market. Its container port is a prime transit point for ivory smuggled from Africa to Asia. Hong Kong officials confiscated roughly eight metric tons of ivory in 2013 and 2.2 tons in 2014. (See three-year timeline of ivory milestones in Hong Kong and mainland China.)
WildAid campaigner and report coauthor Alex Hofford said in reaction to the news, “We are delighted that the Hong Kong government is now adopting an open-minded approach to banning the ivory trade.”
But, he added, “To dovetail its position in line with China, the United States, and the rest of the world, the government needs to now start treating ivory in this city just like hard drugs—[by] initiating criminal and forensic investigations into the city's wildlife traders without delay. And it is time for AFCD's cursory inspections of meaningless bits of paper to end.”
A Hong Kong government spokesperson noted that an investigation was ongoing into the shady traders exposed in the undercover video—but that so far inspections have “revealed no irregularities as the ivory stock were either legal tusks with traceable markings or pre-ban  ivory that match with the records of AFCD. We are following up with investigation on each and every report. We are also in regular touch with the NGOs who are working to end the illegal ivory trade.”
The government needs to now start treating ivory in this city just like hard drugs.
According to the government, Hong Kong’s control mechanisms over its domestic sale of ivory are “stricter than the requirements of CITES”—the international body that regulates wildlife trade.
According to the spokesperson, all license holders “are subject to inspection” and license applications “are scrutinised against proof of legal acquisition and proper record of transaction by AFCD. The ivory covered by such licences and registered with the AFCD was imported into Hong Kong legally and in accordance with the requirements of CITES before the ban on international trade in ivory.”
Mainland China Leads the Way
Hong Kong’s statements come on the heels of a series of steps in mainland China toward elimination of its domestic ivory trade. (Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region of China, which means it can act with a high degree of autonomy on domestic affairs and set its own policies on such retail and conservation matters as trade in ivory.)
In February 2015, China imposed a temporary, one-year ban on imports of carved ivory. In May, China said it would “strictly control ivory processing and trade until the commercial processing and sale of ivory and its products are eventually halted.”
It is time for AFCD's cursory inspections of meaningless bits of paper to end.
And during Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to the U.S. in late September, he and President Barack Obama announced that both countries would “take significant and timely steps to halt the domestic commercial trade of ivory.”
In a response to National Geographic’s request for amplification about Hong Kong’s new open-mindedness and for information about what’s being done about ivory smuggling, a spokesperson for the Environment Bureau and AFCD said, “We are pleased to note the Sino-U.S. agreement on combating wildlife trafficking. With regard to ivory, at this stage we are taking parallel actions on two fronts.”
One measure is to step up enforcement by working with Hong Kong’s Customs and Excise Department and international law enforcement agencies such as the World Customs Organization and INTERPOL.
Priorities the spokesperson outlined are “deploying sniffer dogs to detect ivory at import and export control points, conducting a comprehensive check of all local ivory stock, using tamper-proof holograms to mark ivory, using hi-tech radiocarbon dating analysis to determine the age and hence the legality of ivory, [and] raising public awareness on the protection of endangered species.”
Hong Kong is also liaising with mainland authorities on follow-up actions to the China-U.S. Agreement. “We understand there are timing and implementation details still to be worked out,” the spokesperson said. “As the Mainland legal and administrative system and the Hong Kong system are different, another aspect of our work is to deal with how things would need to be implemented in Hong Kong. This is a complex area.”
Public Support for a Ban
Hong Kong’s potential policy shift is also a response to a growing movement within the city for a ban. (Read about public attitudes to ivory.)
The government needs to move quickly from being open-minded to shutting down the trade.
Protests and petitions during 2014 and 2015 prompted Hong Kong’s top ivory retailers to stop selling ivory products in their stores. Then, in March 2015, 32 Hong Kong deputies submitted a bill to the Standing Committee of China's National People's Congress to ban China’s legal ivory trade.
A survey by the University of Hong Kong released in May 2015 found that an overwhelming majority—75 percent—of Hong Kong’s population supported, or strongly supported, a ban on ivory sales.
The October WildAid report, which was the third in a series of studies that examined Hong Kong’s legal ivory trade, concluded that it provides cover for the illegal trade.
Gavin Edwards, coauthor of an earlier WWF-Hong Kong report, The Hard Truth, called for fast action, saying, “Our analysis shows that the need to halt Hong Kong's ivory trade is an open-and-shut case. The government needs to move quickly from being open-minded regarding a ban to shutting down the trade.”
An overwhelming majority—75 percent—of Hong Kong’s population supported a ban on ivory sales.
As the AFCD spokesperson put it, “We will closely monitor the latest international development and recent development in mainland China in respect of the control of ivory trade (including any ban on domestic trade) and the view of various stakeholders, and will update our strategy and measures for combating illegal trade in ivory as and when necessary.”
Hong Kong lawmaker Elizabeth Quat, who for the past two years has pressed for a ban, calls the change a breakthrough. But, she says, “being open-minded isn’t nearly enough. To implement a law in Hong Kong requires a certain process, so I now call for the government to start this process without delay.”
She hopes the government takes action rather than “simply observing how this would develop, because time is running out for the elephants."