New Analysis Throws Age of Life on Earth Into Doubt

Ben Harder
for National Geographic News
May 23, 2002

The most ancient organisms on Earth don't need Botox to make themselves appear suddenly younger. They might just need a good dose of revisionist geological science.

A fresh reading of the geology and geochemistry of an isolated corner of Greenland could shave at least 50 million years off the presumed age of the first living thing on the planet.

Past analysis of rocks found on Akilia, the remote island off the southwestern coast of Greenland, led scientists to conclude that they were at least 3.85 billion years old and contained evidence of the earliest life on the planet.

Not so, say Chris Fedo, a geologist at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., and Martin Whitehouse, a geologist at the Swedish Museum of Natural History in Stockholm. Having reexamined the rocks, they have reached two startling conclusions: The deposits aren't as old as had been believed, and they might not contain the remnants of living things at all.

The new interpretation is bound to face a fiery crucible as its merits are debated by scientists. Already, it has been challenged by Steve Mojzsis, a geologist at the University of Colorado–Boulder, who previously analyzed the Akilia rocks and champions the alternative theory.

Life on the Rocks?

One patch of rock on Akilia is striped with alternating bands of green and white. Mojzsis concluded that sediments deposited on the bottom of an ocean at least 3.85 billion years old formed the banded rocks. "That would [make] them the oldest known sediments on the Earth," he says.

Because sediments accumulate underwater, Mojzsis's interpretation implies that the rocks formed at a time when watery environments—believed to have been the setting for life's evolution—existed. Sedimentary rock forms gradually, as material in water drifts down, settles on the ocean floor, and eventually hardens into stone. The process deposits layers of different minerals at different times, often leaving a striped bed of alternating rock types behind.

The Akilia rocks also contain graphite, a form of compacted carbon. Mojzsis's analysis of the graphite indicates that it is rich in low-weight carbon atoms, which are typically produced by the metabolic activities of living organisms rather than by natural geological processes. From that evidence, he inferred that the Akilia graphite was the remains of ancient, though unrecognizably compressed, life-forms.

Funded in part by the National Geographic Society, Fedo and Whitehouse visited Akilia, inspected the rocks, and arrived at a different conclusion. The pair published their findings in the May 24 issue of the journal Science.

"These rocks are not as fresh as they were the day they formed," says Fedo. For billions of years, he says, "they've been squashed tens of miles underground. The rocks are so strongly deformed that understanding the original relationships [among different layers] is extraordinarily difficult."

Continued on Next Page >>




NEWS FEEDS     After installing a news reader, click on this icon to download National Geographic News's XML/RSS feed.   After installing a news reader, click on this icon to download National Geographic News's XML/RSS feed.

Get our news delivered directly to your desktop—free.
How to Use XML or RSS

National Geographic Daily News To-Go

Listen to your favorite National Geographic news daily, anytime, anywhere from your mobile phone. No wires or syncing. Download Stitcher free today.
Click here to get 12 months of National Geographic Magazine for $15.