The detection of this planet was illusion,sometimes we could see something not existing!!!The observer is right coz our brain make such image http://balipie.blogspot.com/
PHOTOGRAPH BY ALAN FRIEDMAN
Published July 3, 2014
But according to a paper published Thursday in the journal Science, that excitement was misplaced. (Related: "First Truly Habitable Planet Discovered, Experts Say.")
"Gliese 581g doesn't exist," said lead author Paul Robertson of Penn State University in State College, Pennsylvania. Neither, he said, does another planet in the same solar system, known as Gliese 581d, announced in 2009—less clearly hospitable to life, but still once seen by some astronomers as a possible place to find aliens.
The original evidence for both worlds' existence came from measurements of its home star, Gliese 581—a dim red dwarf, about a third as massive as the sun, that resides about 22 light-years away from our solar system. (Related: "Land on 'Goldilocks' Planet for Sale on Ebay.")
Most exoplanets are too close to their stars to be seen directly with telescopes, so astronomers find them with indirect clues. In the case of Gliese 581g, they watched for subtle wobbles caused by the gravity of an orbiting planet tugging back and forth on the star in a regular pattern.
That's what Paul Butler of the Carnegie Institution for Science, in Washington, D.C., and Steven Vogt of the University of California, Santa Cruz, thought they'd observed when they announced the discovery of Gliese 581g.
The time it took the "planet" to complete one orbit (37 days) told them how far it was from the star. In the case of this cool star, that was "just at the right distance to have liquid water on its surface," Butler said at the time. The strength of the tugging, meanwhile, told them the planet was about three times as massive as Earth.
But even at the time, other astronomers questioned whether Gliese 581g was really there. A star's wobbles are measured by looking at its spectrum—its light, smeared out to form a sort of rainbow. The wobbles are so tiny, however, that it takes some statistical analysis to find a back-and-forth pattern.
Critics such as exoplanet expert Eric Ford, then at the University of Florida and now at Penn State, said that Butler's and Vogt's analysis was unconvincing, arguing that the pattern wasn't even clearly there.
Robertson and his colleagues, however, did find a pattern: "There is a real, physical signal," he said. The bad news: "It's just that it's coming from the star itself, not from the gravity of planets d and g."
What's happening, they say, is that magnetic disturbances on Gliese 581's surface—starspots—are altering the star's spectrum in such a way that it mimics the motion induced by a planet.
The star itself rotates once every 130 days, carrying the starspots with it; the disputed planets appeared to have periods of almost exactly one half and one fourth of the 130-day period. When the scientists corrected for the starspot signal, both planets disappeared.
"This analysis demonstrates pretty convincingly that these signatures are more due to stellar activity than to the existence of planets," said Ford, who wasn't involved in this research. (Butler declined to comment on the new result, and Vogt did not respond to an emailed request for comment.)
At the same time, subtracting the starspot signal actually made the evidence for three other worlds in the Gliese 581 system—planets b, c, and e, all of which are too hot to be habitable—even stronger.
"It's unfortunate that the other planets don't exist," said co-author Suvrath Mahadevan, also at Penn State. "But the important takeaway is that stellar activity is an important source of contamination, and that we can [now] take it into account."
It's very encouraging, agreed Robertson, that "we can now take out the stellar influence and reveal the planet's existence."
Follow Michael D. Lemonick on Twitter.
Dwarf planets are not merely oversized comets. A dwarf planet is a body, usually consisting of ice and rock, which has sufficient gravity to pull itself into a sphere but not enough gravity to clear other celestial bodies from its' orbit. They can even have their own satellites. Therefore Pluto is still a planet in the same way that a white dwarf star is still a star.@edd jhonson
It is hard to comprehend that people still believe that we are alone!
There are billions of stars and counting it has to be something up there.
Proof of life on other planets will be the most devastating news in history and will cause massive repercussions in our society. Proof of intelligent life on other planets will be disastrous on an even greater order of magnitude.
Just goes to show you science is where it's at! Despite wanting to believe, they found evidence against a happy thought and debunked themselves instead of allowing us to follow an empty, void truth.
Good to see Science is always self-correcting. Imagine if we sent a probe there and found an illusion... However, this will not make the front pages like the Original story did so nearly everybody thinks "post it and believe it" Science is the Best.
“The only thing that scares me more than space aliens is the idea that there aren't any space aliens. We can't be the best that creation has to offer. I pray we're not all there is. If so, we're in big trouble.”
The detection of this planet was illusion,sometimes we could see something not existing!!!The observer is right coz our brain make such images
the moon is a hologram I notice there were clouds behind it, didn't make sense other than venus is projecting it with a three dimensional laser.
@Edwin Gomez The biggest one being that it's possible for life to appear out of non living matter all by itself, and the second being that this unlikely event has happened more than once in the time since the big bang. the third thing is that this happens in a habitable zone. mathematically this is very bring the probability to near 0 even with the number of our stars we have in the universe
@Edwin Gomez that is based on a few very big assumptions which science still has no evidence or answers to
@Saurav Katare Don't worry. We aren't and neither you or me will live to find out.
@Andrew Symonette I don't even know how to reply to this...
Pluto is a huge comet. Its about 50% ice and if it showed up in the inner solar system it would have a tail. Pluto is not a planet, get over it.
@Tom Goldberg Plus they already classified pluto as a dwarf planet. Meaning its not a 100% planet neither it is a 100% comet
@Tom Goldberg The sun doesn't share our prejudice towards Pluto, it still floats around the sun receiving its warmth from it. Calling or naming Pluto by any other thing doesn't change anything, not at all..
Feed the World
How do we feed nine billion people by 2050, and how do we do so sustainably?
We've made our magazine's best stories about the future of food available in a free iPad app.
Latest From Nat Geo
These cooing Casanovas use showstopping plumage to court females and fend off rivals.
Meet a trapper who keeps Florida's streets, sewers, and Kennedy Space Center alligator free.