Photograph by Melitón Tapia, INAH
Published February 18, 2014
Archaeologists in Mexico City have made an extraordinary discovery—the skeletons of 12 dogs all mysteriously buried together more than 500 years ago, in the Aztec capital of Tenochtitlan.
Dog burials have been uncovered before at archaeological digs, but this is a first such finding not associated with a building or a human burial, according to a report published in Spanish last week by Mexico's National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH).
Dogs were important symbolically in Aztec mythology. They were believed to serve their masters even after death, guiding the soul of the deceased through the many hazardous layers of the underworld to reach Mictlan, the place of the dead. Also, a god known as Xolotl—sometimes depicted with the head of a dog—had strong ties to the underworld.
Whether the Aztecs associated the buried dogs with such symbolism is still unknown. The researchers hope that the burial offers deeper insights into how dogs were regarded by the residents of the chief city of the Aztecs.
Working in an area measuring 6.5 square feet (two square meters), the archaeologists discovered the canine remains between 4.2 feet (1.3 meters) and 5.5 feet (1.7 meters) below the current street level.
The skeletons were mostly complete and well preserved, but their burial follows no particular pattern that the archaeologists could discern.
The dogs were all of medium height, represent various ages at death, and retained most of their teeth. They were probably common dogs, not native Mexican breeds such as the techichi (known for their short stature) or the xoloitzcuintli (which loses its premolar teeth in adulthood).
Nearby excavation sites yielded a style of pottery known as Aztec III. These orange-clay vessels, decorated in black geometric designs, help date the dogs to the period known as the Late Postclassic, from A.D. 1350 to 1520.
The archaeological investigations have been carried out in the neighborhood known as Azcapotzalco, in the northwestern part of the sprawling Mexican capital. During ancient times, this area would have sat on the western shore of the lake known as Texcoco, which is now a dry lakebed completely covered with the city's buildings and streets.
Archaeologists believe that the Aztecs who lived in this neighborhood may have deposited their domestic trash along the lakeshore in order to raise the level of the land and prevent flooding. A variety of domestic artifacts have come to light in the area, such as pottery, bone needles, obsidian blades, musical instruments made from human and canine bones, the carved bone of a deer, and the bones of turkeys and dogs that were served as meals.
Yes, the Aztecs ate dogs. In fact, they raised the animals mostly for food.
The archaeologists working in Azcapotzalco plan to dig deeper to see if they can uncover clues to the meaning of the dog cemetery. Also, an analysis of the bones could reveal the cause of death, possible illnesses or malformations, or other evidence that would help the scientists figure out why the dogs were laid together in this place for eternity.
It is inaccurate to perpetuate the belief that all Xoloitzcuintli dogs are missing teeth at adulthood. This ancient breed has always come in both hairless and coated varieties -- frequently with both types in the same litter. The coated Xoloitzcuintli does not lose its premolars as an adult. It is only in relatively recent years that the hairless variety has received more attention due to the novelty of its lack of coat.
Who knows! Do we really have to worry about finding this out? Could be some old lady's companions that it broke her heart when she had to eat them, or could just be the remains of the Aztec equivalent of a party.
Kazuyoshi, that is an amazing story, however it noted in the article that there were no human burials near, and also the dogs were not Xoloitzcuintli because they lose their premolar teeth during adulthood.
Then again, you really sound like you know a lot more about this subject matter than just the measly bit that I just read. I'm honestly not out to "troll" you :)
Actually, they used to bury a dog with the people that passed away, this is because every single one of the "four" directions (north, east, west and south) had a color, temperature, and a deity associated with them. The North has the color white, cold temperature and the deity is called Mixcoatl, the direction or the land of the north is called Mictlan or Mictlantecutli, Where the temperature is cold, the land were is told that the "Obsidian Butterfly" (itzpapalotl) a butterfly that has blades in its wings flies and slices open the skin of men that dare to go there, in the Mictlan there is a river, that must be crossed by all the people that die. In order to find peace, but they will not find it unless they come with a companion that guides them! That is a xoloitzcuintli dog (aztec dog without hair). And that is why they used to bury dogs with people. I always thought that this was really interesting specially if you relate it to the inuit cultures up north. And how they use dogs that help them find paths. Note that the "Obsidian Butterfly" and Mixcoatl are both squeletical deities that govern the Mictlan. (land of the dead). There is one special occasion were the dead are allowed to leave the Mictlan, that as you may assume is the "day of the dead" mexican celebration that still takes place today, In this day the dead are allowed to leave the Mictlan and visit their relatives for one day. They can also delight themselves with food, that is why the tradition dictates that an offering must be placed.
What the Aztecs did with dogs seems quite similar to what we do with cows in the cattle industry today.
Looks more like random pack got caught in their escape route during an climatic event. No pattern to burial, nor wrapping of the dead material clinging to skin. Also factor no other burials found.
looks like a mummy dog
@Sheena Burks -- Sheena, please see my post above. These *may* not be Xoloitzcuintli, but not because they have teeth. Xolos come in both hairless and coated, frequently in the same litter, and the ones with coat have normal teeth. It's only the hairless ones that are usually missing their premolars and have otherwise abnormal (compared to most dogs) teeth. The reason for this is because the gene that causes hairlessness also affects the teeth. (The coated littermates will almost always have normal dentition. You can read more about this in the breed's entry on Wikipedia.)
So... they could have been Xolos, or not. But it has nothing to do with their teeth! :)
@annie branwen They ate people, too. Cortez was so shocked by the ritual cannibalism that he immediately started to exterminate the people; similarly, the Romans destroyed the druid-type people and religions in Gaul and Britain. Western civilization and cannibalism don't mix.
@annie branwen Peruvians eat Guinea Pigs, iguanas are eaten throughout most parts of Mexico, and a number of countries think that our drinking a liquid that you have to squeeze out of a bovine's udders is waaaay beyond weird.
@Suzanne Barnes Maybe someday we will all learn that taking any life to eat is wrong. I'm hopeful!
@MJ C. You're far too liberal. Are you also going to enforce that logic with wild animals? Idiot.
Special Ad Section
Our new Phenomena space blogger, Nadia Drake, will be bringing you tales from beyond our home planet.
Latest News Video
During one of the worst droughts in centuries, California's top snow surveyor is sounding the alarm.