Photograph by Randy Olson, National Geographic
Published July 11, 2013
As of Thursday, which the United Nations has declared World Population Day, there are 7.2 billion people and counting on planet Earth.
By 2050, demographers from the United Nations project that the population will reach 9.6 billion.
But that projection has changed considerably in recent years. In 2000, the UN predicted a population with 700 million fewer people than it is predicting now—only 8.9 billion people in 2050.
Other organizations, meanwhile, have slightly different 2050 projections. The United States Census Bureau projects a population of 9.4 billion. The Population Reference Bureau, a nongovernmental group that tracks U.S. demographics, has increased its projection by two million since their last estimates were published in 2010; their number now matches the UN estimate.
What explains why these figures evolve and why they don't exactly sync up?
Population projections are dynamic. While they are often reflective of the real world, many factors that determine future trend lines are unclear and evolving.
Three Big Population Drivers
In predicting future population size, demographers first assume a no-surprise future and focus on three main drivers of population—births, deaths, and migration. Life expectancy is kept on a consistent upward trend, and unpredictable events like epidemics and wars are ruled out.
"The HIV/AIDS epidemic—it was not predicted, and it substantially changed the demographics of some countries in the 1970s," said Francois Pelletier, chief of the population estimates and projections section of the United Nations.
When it comes to analyzing the three big population drivers, demographers draw on surveys and census data from around the world. The UN also takes into account progress made in achieving internationally agreed upon initiatives such as the Millenium Development Goals.
That information is used to reassess past population projections and generate a revised report.
In the case of the biannual UN population report, World Population Prospects, three distinct population projections are created—high, medium, and low variants. The middle variant—which this year is 9.6 billion people in 2050—is the one that gets the most attention.
The high variant assumes each woman has half a child more than the medium variant, which leads to a prediction of 10.9 billion for 2050. The low variant assumes half a child less, which would result in a 2050 population of 8.3 billion.
No Crystal Ball
But Robert Engelman, president of environmental research organization World Watch Institute, said that there is no "crystal ball" for population projections and plenty of room for error.
Changing fertility and birthrates have the potential to significantly impact future population levels. The 2012 UN report said that population growth has slowed for the world overall. Still, however, it will be rapid in developing regions like Nigeria and Malawi, where populations are projected to increase at least fivefold by 2100.
And then there are the unknown unknowns.
"If an asteroid hits the Earth in the right place, there may be little or no population in 2050," Engelman said. "And demographers don't think about asteroids."
Pelletier said errors in population dynamics at the global level tend to cancel themselves out.
"If there's a country where you're a bit off and a bit too high, and another where you're a bit too low, then the population number evens out," he said.
That helps explain why the UN's projections are relatively consistent with other recent population figures for 2050.
Demographers say there is little reason to anticipate a population bomb or doomsday situation. In fact, the population growth rate has already started to slow, and this downward trend is projected to continue through 2050.
Follow Jaclyn Skurie on Twitter.
predicted to be 9.6 billion by 2050. If were to survive this sinking ship/plant Earth, well need to work together, as a planet, as a country and as a
family. My South Africans solution, @DezWeeks, builds on the foundation
of our born free generation’s sense of entitlement, and expectation-that
government will obviously take the lead. At its core is the rite of each person to
have a child, and the right to its education and employment in life, but the
government then has the right to limit offspring to one child. This could be done though
providing each child born with a means based grant but in essence a passing of the baton, passing your own grant onto
your first child itself. The government would further affect control of surplus
births by taxing parents- a tax geared at recovering the costs of
further grants and education to the state and scaled up, to the planet. The goal of lower birth-rates, at moderate
economic development, would keep the country viable and reduce our 25%
unemployment nightmare. https://twitter.com/DezWeeks/status/355785613426970624
A nightmare scenario. Birth control is the only solution, otherwise we will go down in a plethora of wars and epidemics. Water and food and space will become critical. Mass extinction of other biota.
impresionante proyección... nos vamos caer del planeta.. que se hará con la basura.. ?? que territorio tomaremos de los animales ???
Great facts which the public needs to know. But I wouldn't rely on the opinion of demographers regarding whether current projections, if played out, will result in a catastrophe of some sort. That is outside their area of expertise, as illustrated by their answer. Ask the scientists.
Many believe there is cause for great concern. Some believe we'll never hit those numbers because mass starvation and conflict will kick in due to limited resources.
We just released an informative World Population Day video in which we checked in with average folks to see what they know and think about population. Check it out at: http://worldpopulationday.org/should-we-stop-worrying-and-love-the-population-bomb/
Director of the documentary
GrowthBusters: Hooked on Growth
@Dave Gardner . Puede ser que disminuya la población por lo citado por usted , problemas como el AGUA. , enfermedades .Que sucederá ??. Creo que no lo sabremos con exactitud. Saludos.
Explore With Nat Geo
Anders Angerbjörn learns little foxes have big attitudes.
Special Ad Section
Shop book & DVD gifts for all ages. Plus, save on maps featuring award-winning cartography. Limited time only.