National Geographic Daily News
14 comments
Ferdinand Jw Wiryaatmaja
Ferdinand Jw Wiryaatmaja

I wish to have it in my aquarium to see how long it takes to finish that single bone !  a month , a year ?  really amazing !  bravo 2 NGP team .

Babu Ranganathan
Babu Ranganathan

NOT MADE BY NATURE! Just because something exists in nature doesn't mean it was invented or made by Nature. If all the chemicals necessary to make a cell were left to themselves, "Mother Nature" would have no ability to re-organize them into a cell. It takes an already existing cell to bring about another cell. The cell exists and reproduces in nature but Nature didn't invent or design it! Nature didn't originate the cell or any form of life.

Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a cell. Once you have a complete and living cell then the genetic program and biological machinery exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how could the cell have originated naturally when no directing code and mechanisms existed in nature? All of the founders of modern science believed in God. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM 

Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from sea sponge to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Survival of the fittest would actually have prevented evolution across kinds! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! (2nd Edition). I discuss: Punctuated Equilibria, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
 
Natural selection doesn't produce biological traits or variations. It can only "select" from biological variations that are possible and which have survival value. The real issue is what biological variations are possible, not natural selection. Only limited evolution, variations of already existing genes and traits are possible. Nature is mindless and has no ability to design and program entirely new genes for entirely new traits.

Visit my newest Internet site: THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION

Sincerely,
Babu G. Ranganathan*
(B.A. theology/biology)

Author of popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS

* I have had the privilege of being recognized in the 24th edition of Marquis "Who's Who In The East" for my writings on religion and science, and I have given successful lectures (with question and answer time afterwards) defending creation from science before evolutionist science faculty and students at various colleges and universities.

Tom Vocke
Tom Vocke

@Babu Ranganathan First off, caps-lock is not necessary to win an argument, in fact, I disabled it all together. Second, please read this, no pressure [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye ] . It is and article about how the eye might have evolved, with many interesting links , and notibly, scientific papers with research about this evolution, with facts and such. You dont have to beleive it, but at least be informed if you try to convince other people.... Don't be shy on following the links either, might get you somewhere interesting.

Andres Heredia
Andres Heredia

@Babu Ranganathan Ok dude, I see your posts on almost every article here. You spew the same old arguments that have been refuted again and again. I suggest that  you open your mind and actually read what people who know about the subject matter have to say, not just listen to creationists or "Intelligent Design" proponents. 

Seriously though, all of your posts are a joke. Why even bother commenting here? Like any scientifically literate person is going to take you seriously...

Mike Bardsley
Mike Bardsley

@Babu Ranganathan you write "Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from sea sponge to human)."

If there really is a God at the source of all life on Earth, evolution within, across, or circular should be possible. Do you presume to limit God?

Don Hall
Don Hall

@Babu Ranganathan Bob and his argument hold no water. The current teachings in academia are aligned with their own version of theology ... a riddled, porous and best-guess analogy of "evolution". Try answering how the body composition and parts all work (at the micro and macro levels) with evolution and its beyond a joke! Babu Ranganathan has hit the nail on the head ... natural selection fails (miserably) to coexist with "evolution" period. Natural Selection is a mystery in how it "produces" new species, tissues, organs and the like. I for one would ask evolution-ists how exactly did the long neck giraffe survive long enough to develop such a physique! Now that is just about all needed to quash the evo theory. However, the question as to the white and red blood cells, energy transfer, respiration and the miracle we call a brain ... is just something evo has no clearly defined answer as to how this all came to be ... and how the human body became Animated. Evo is just foaming, petulant non-sense and Babu has quite readily presented his case. REally there exists no need to prove anything, the case for life and its miracle are in the eye of the beholder ... and the Evo proponents are clearly blind. Blind leading the Blind should be the tag line for any Evolution based science. A hundred years of fallacy, leap of faith geology and a single dumb moth example is all that Bob and his kind have in their pathetic quivers. You Go Babu! Good show! Great work.

bob wright
bob wright

@Babu Ranganathan You're fighting an obsessive losing battle. The unity of life is beyond dispute. The only reason for this refusal to accept the self-evident is theology. You have a preconception based on a totally inadequate myth, and must do whatever you can to sustain a bad idea. Given human powers of rationalization, this isn't really that much of a chore - humans can believe and find rationalizations for absolutely anything. But you are in effect arguing that since you can't see cells differentiating in adults, that it is impossible that adults emerged from first eggs, and then children. Lots of specious proofs are possible, all equally, in the end, absurd. 

Eric Paul
Eric Paul

@Don Hall @Babu Ranganathan You have to laugh, and laugh hard, at those that claim life, as we know it, is too complex to have originated from inorganic matter and could ONLY have originated from an even more complex, single entity who evolved from.....wait for it....wait for it....NOTHING!  And if one even bothers to waste their time arguing with someone who's clearly delusional by asking them "well then how did this entity evolve?".  They'll tell you - "He's (I love how this entity is usually a male) always been there".  Which contradicts the exact claim in which they were arguing - that something can't just "appear" and must come from something else.  Gotta love it.  I don't even know why atheists even bother arguing evolution, you don't even have to go there with these numbnuts....

bob wright
bob wright

@Don Hall @Babu Ranganathan Yeah, no. Your argument is "I don't understand this, so nobody else does either" and then you go on to demonstrate the excellence of your non-understanding by saying "How did the giraffe survive long enough to develop its neck" as if this triumphantly proves something or other. Your amazement at how the body came to be capital-A Animated shows what a hodge-podge of vague confusion you are just barely coping with. You can quibble all you like with the mechanisms of evolution, but its occurrence is unarguable. If you actually want to understand "how the body composition and parts all work" it can be done - I have done it. It has nothing exactly to do with evolution, except in particulars such as "Why do myosin filaments have two heads" and so on - questions which cannot be answered except by evolution. But it's in the traceable history of the physical structure of life across species that all your god-of-the-gaps arguments founder, fail utterly, and sink beneath the waves. Only your total ignorance of the subject saves you from realising this. 

How to Feed Our Growing Planet

  • Feed the World

    Feed the World

    National Geographic explores how we can feed the growing population without overwhelming the planet in our food series.

See blogs, stories, and news »

The Innovators Project

See more innovators »

Latest News Video

  • Mazes: Key to Brain Development?

    Mazes: Key to Brain Development?

    Mazes are a powerful tool for neuroscientists trying to figure out the brain and help us learn to grapple with the unexpected.

See more videos »

See Us on Google Glass

Shop Our Space Collection

  • Be the First to Own <i>Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey</i>

    Be the First to Own Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey

    The updated companion book to Carl Sagan's Cosmos, featuring a new forward by Neil deGrasse Tyson is now available. Proceeds support our mission programs, which protect species, habitats, and cultures.

Shop Now »