National Geographic Daily News
A distant supernova is surrounded by many brighter stars.

The newfound supernova's host galaxy is boxed in a 2010 image by the Hubble Space Telescope.

Image courtesy A. Riess, D. Jones, and S. Rodney, STScI/JHU/ESA/NASA

Andrew Fazekas

for National Geographic News

Published April 5, 2013

NASA's Hubble Space Telescope has spied a supernova ten billion light-years from Earth—the most distant stellar explosion of its kind ever detected, a new study says. (See "Biggest Star Explosion Seen; Was Rare, 'Clean' Death.")

The faint, near-infrared speck of light from this ancient beacon, dubbed  UDS10Wil, now pushes back the previous record-holder by 350 million light-years.

The newfound supernova, along with seven other stellar blasts more than nine billion light-years out, is part of a three-year Hubble survey of faraway supernovae.

These eight faraway phenomena appear to be Type Ia supernovae, which are used as "standard candles" because they emit approximately the same amount of energy in the form of light whether they're in a galaxy close to us or billions of light-years away. The small differences that exist can be calibrated.

This means astronomers can observe how bright they appear, compare that with how bright they should be, and use the difference to deduce how far they are from Earth.

"So far this object shows that supernovae are still proving to be excellent standard candles, although we are looking forward to performing a full analysis with our entire supernova sample," said study leader David Jones, an astronomer at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland.

UDS10Wil occurred in the early universe—less than four billion years after the big bang—when astronomers believe its environment and ancestor stars might have been quite different from the modern cosmos.

"This study is a way of stress-testing supernovae, by seeing if they can still provide reliable distance measurements in these unique conditions," added Jones, whose study was published May 10 in the Astrophysical Journal.

Shedding Light on Dark Energy

The new blast is exciting the astronomy community at large because it's the same type of blast used to deduce that the universe's expansion is accelerating due to a mysterious force called dark energy.

"To best understand dark energy, we need a good understanding of Type Ia supernovae and how they evolve with cosmic time," said Mario Livio, an astrophysicist at the Space Telescope Science Institute—located on the Johns Hopkins campus—who is not connected with the study.

"Observations of supernovae at this [distance] can help us examine potential evolutionary effects in the supernovae themselves, and these, in turn, will give us a cleaner picture of the nature of dark energy." (See "Is Dark Energy Really 'Repulsive Gravity'?")

Far-Out Supernovae

Could there be even more remote supernovae awaiting discovery? Possibly, but the task is a daunting one—the farther into the distance we look, the farther back in time it is. That means there are progressively fewer galaxies and consequently a significant dropoff in the numbers of supernovae. (See supernovae pictures.)

But Andrew Howell, an astronomer at the University of California, Santa Barbara, pointed out that there's one supernova exploding somewhere in the universe every second. So this perceived rarity may simply be due to the inherent challenge involved in hunting down these remote, faint supernovae.

"With this finding they are really pushing the boundaries of what is possible with the Hubble Space Telescope," explained Howell.

"But to find enough to make it scientifically interesting, we need new technology, like a whole new space observatory," he added.

When Hubble's successor, the James Webb Space Telescope, begins observing in 2018, it will be able to look out even farther, noted study leader Jones.

"With a telescope this powerful, we may be able to observe supernova explosions in which the exploding star is one of the first stars formed in the universe."

5 comments
Luis Gonzalez-Mestres
Luis Gonzalez-Mestres

Dark energy is a very ad hoc hypothesis to explain cosmic acceleration. But is it really needed ? Perhaps one should first explore the nature of space-time itself, and in particular the way elementary particles see it. The wave functions of most matter particles (proton, neutron, electron, muon, neutrinos, quarks...) are spinors, and the SU(2) group replaces that of conventional space rotations. 

Since 1996, I am suggesting to use a spinorial space-time (two complex coordinates instead of the four real ones) in Cosmology. One then gets a sensible, purely geometric, description of cosmic expansion with a ratio between galactic relative speeds and distances naturally equal to the inverse of the age of the Universe. In such a pattern, it is possible to explain the present cosmic acceleration as a fluctuation without using dark energy. 

See, for instance, my Science 2.0 article Dark matter and dark energy, or Pre-Big Bang geometry?  (blog Relativity and beyond it ), and references therein.

Best regards

Luis Gonzalez-Mestres, France


Andrew Booth
Andrew Booth

After many years my head still spins after trying to comprehend such incredible distances. If you moved a pebble forward one millimetre every New Year then you would move it six million miles in ten billion years! That's 222 times around the Earth! It just makes me feel very small and humble. I just wonder how much further the James Webb Telescope will actually see.

Reid Barnes
Reid Barnes like.author.displayName 1 Like

"If supernovae were popcorn, the question is how long before they start popping?" Adam Riess, an astronomer at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Md., said in a statement. "You may have different theories about what is going on in the kernel. If you see when the first kernels popped and how often they popped, it tells you something important about the process of popping corn."  Great metaphor!  But can we learn what is important if we deliberately filter our understanding and view only through a lens which is warped by a theory based on self-contradicting non-Euclidean geometry?  See the Facebook Note, The Problem With Non-Euclidean Geometry… https://www.facebook.com/notes/reid-barnes/the-problem-with-non-euclidean-geometry-or-the-lite-triangle-axiom-part-two/541137095938869

Amandalynn Cooke
Amandalynn Cooke

@Reid Barnes They recently found evidence of much smaller, super novas. The outer layer mixes with helium instead of hydrogen, and the explosion is so less significant, that the star itself, remains intact and normally unharmed. The luminosity of the explosion itself measures only up to one percent of a traditional super nova. The weak type 1a supernovas now have their own names, Type 1ax. The new found information can greatly help out understanding of how stars work :)

How to Feed Our Growing Planet

  • Feed the World

    Feed the World

    National Geographic explores how we can feed the growing population without overwhelming the planet in our food series.

See blogs, stories, photos, and news »

The Innovators Project

  • Teen Wonder: Taylor Wilson

    Teen Wonder: Taylor Wilson

    After achieving nuclear fusion at age 14, Taylor, now 19, is working with subatomic particles for solutions to nuclear terrorism and cancer.

See more innovators »

Phenomena

See more posts »

Latest News Video

  • How a T. Rex Packs for a Road Trip

    How a T. Rex Packs for a Road Trip

    The nation's most complete Tyrannosaurus rex specimen is taking a 2,000-mile road trip from Montana to its new home in Washington, D.C.

See more videos »

See Us on Google Glass

Shop Our Space Collection

  • Be the First to Own <i>Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey</i>

    Be the First to Own Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey

    The updated companion book to Carl Sagan's Cosmos, featuring a new forward by Neil deGrasse Tyson is now available. Proceeds support our mission programs, which protect species, habitats, and cultures.

Shop Now »