National Geographic Daily News
6 comments
julie Keeney
julie Keeney

Those photos are hideous.  People are going to get what they deserve....we are so messed up.

julie Keeney
julie Keeney

I only wish the dolphins and the whales were armed too.  That would be a game changer.  That would be fair.  Come on, people.  For once, choose to take care of the beautiful bountiful planet that God gave us and entrusted us to care for instead of just reducing it to a bloody pulp, just this once.  You might like the way it feels for a change.

Sarah Gaines
Sarah Gaines

These people (as seen in the picture) are using modern conveniences for an ancient purpose. If they have access to quality weapons and clothing, they have access to other, far more humane sources of food. Tradition is not a legitimate excuse for unnecessary cruelty. If it is health that they are concerned about, there are direct correlations between the amount of meat a society eats and how long its members tend to live (as has been demonstrated over and over again in studies over the last 50 years-the human body simply doesn't process meat very well). But, as George Bernard Shaw said, "custom will reconcile people to any atrocity."

Ethan N.
Ethan N.

"There are some countries that eat cows, and there are other countries that eat whales or dolphins," Yutaka Aoki, fisheries division director at Japan's Foreign Ministry, told the Associated Press after the film won its Academy Award in 2010. "A film about slaughtering cows or pigs might also be unwelcome to workers in that industry."

Cows and dolphins are domesticated and bred in captivity and number in the millions. Dolphins and whales are wild animals that are not maintained with captive breeding and are slowly being killed off to the brink of extinction.  Implement a domesticated marine mammal program before you use such a facile argument, Mr. Aoki.  

pacha mama
pacha mama

@Ethan N.

or, we could educate and encourage the public to explore alternative dietary options (vegetarian, vegan) that are healthy, affordable, and available. at the very least, i believe the consumer has a responsibility--if not a moral obligation--to better educated themselves on the impact cases such as these are having on a global scale.


in the matter of manufacturing cattle/poultry for human consumption, consumers need to seriously consider, a) how crudely these animals are cared for, b) how inhumanely they are slaughtered--chickens in particular are slaughtered, on average, at a speed of 100+ chickens per minute, that is stagering), and c) the impact on our health from eating meat from animals that are potentially diseased, have been abused, or have been injected with hormones and antibiotics their whole lives.


i personally don't eat meat--and never will again, for ethical reason, obviously--but i see nothing wrong with other people eating meat so long as the animals are treated with respect, live free and healthy lives, and are slaughtered humanely. not only could this ensurers humans get good quality meat, but this is healthy on a collective level! there is also a strong growing market for truly free range meat.

 my two cents

Sarah Gaines
Sarah Gaines

@pacha mama @Ethan N. I feel the same way- but I think that as long as animals are being raised for consumption, they will never be allowed to live as they should, because animals raised for food aren't really animals under the law, they're just figures in someone's pocketbook, and companies treat them as such. 

From the Archives

Rio+20 Photos

Road to Rio+20

More »

Connect With Nat Geo