Photograph courtesy Jürgen Dengler
Published March 20, 2012
In a recent study, biologists scoured data from previous papers about plant-rich ecosystems around the world and discovered that grasslands harbor the most plant species in areas less than 540 square feet (50 square meters).
"The general perception is that the most species-rich places in the world are tropical rain forests. Depending on how you look at it, that's correct," said study co-author Robert Peet, a plant ecologist at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
But the grasslands diversity "surprised us as we looked through studies and databases. We knew grasslands would be on the list, but not at the top [for so many scales]," Peet said.
What's more, "these are relatively infertile, long-grazed, or mowed grasslands," he said.
(See a map of the world's grasslands.)
Peet and three other biologists gathered data from all the species inventories they could find, then determined species richness—or the diversity of species in a specific place—in terms of area.
At large scales, tropical rain forests were most diverse. A rain forest in Ecuador, for example, holds the record for an area of 2.5 acres (1 hectare) with 942 species. Meanwhile a Costa Rican rain forest won the 1,075 square-foot (100 square-meter) category with 233 different plant species.
Tropical rain forests hog most of the species-rich limelight because their canopies often reach more than 165 feet (50 meters) above the forest floor.
That's a lot of area for species to flock, but height isn't everything when it comes to the species richness of vascular plants—a group including ferns; flowering plants, which encompass grasses and most trees; conifers; club mosses; and more.
European, Argentine Grasslands Win Out
In grasslands and meadows of Eastern Europe and Argentina, such plants reign supreme.
A 527-square-foot (49-square-meter) patch of Czech grassland contained 131 vascular plant species—the most cataloged.
A patch of Argentine grassland that's only 10 square feet (1 square meter) contained 89 species. And in just a square foot (0.1 square meter) of Romanian grassland, 43 species thrived.
"That's an awful lot to pack into such a small area," said Peet, whose study appeared online March 16 in the Journal of Vegetation Science.
"We think mowing or grazing levels the playing field for competition for light on top," he said.
"That, combined with slow growth rates and infertile soils, probably allows grass species to cram into small areas."
Peet also noted that fertilized lawns aren't biodiversity hot spots—the extra nutrients allow only a few plant species to flourish and thus crowd out other species.
(Read about threats to grasslands.)
Grassland Diversity a Mystery
The team hopes its results will encourage ecologists to look more closely at why only two kinds of ecosystems—tropical rain forests and grasslands—win out in terms of species diversity.
The scientists also plan to perform more comprehensive surveys that capture the average number of plant species across regions and ecosystems.
"Regardless, I think we're going to see this pattern repeated in principle" over many geographic regions, Peet said.
(More on species diversity from Scienceblogs: "Re-examining the cause of speciation and species diversity in the tropics")
It's all hands (and paws) on deck when it comes to the poaching crisis in Africa.
In this new series, writers and photographers from around the world reflect on places that hold special meaning for them.
For Sebastián García Iglesias, the ghosts of his ancestors are stitched to the tapestry of the land they pioneered.
The Future of Food
Food. It's driven nearly everything we've ever done as a species, and yet it's one of the most overlooked aspects of human history.
We've made our magazine's best stories about the future of food available in a free iPad app.