Those convinced against their will, are of the same opinion still....
Photograph courtesy NASA
Forty years after U.S. astronaut Neil Armstrong became the first human to set foot on the moon, many conspiracy theorists still insist the Apollo 11 moon landing was an elaborate hoax. Examine the photographic evidence, and find out why experts say some of the most common claims simply don't hold water.
You can tell Apollo was faked because ... the American flag appears to be flapping as if "in a breeze" in videos and photographs supposedly taken from the airless lunar surface.
The fact of the matter is ... "the video you see where the flag's moving is because the astronaut just placed it there, and the inertia from when they let go kept it moving," said spaceflight historian Roger Launius, of the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum in Washington D.C.
The astronauts also accidentally bent the horizontal rods holding the flag in place several times, creating the appearance of a rippling flag in photographs (Apollo 11 moon-landing pictures).
Published July 16, 2009
Photograph courtesy NASA
Neil Armstrong and the Eagle lunar lander are reflected in Buzz Aldrin's visor in one of the most famous images taken during the July 1969 moon landing.
You can tell Apollo was faked because ... only two astronauts walked on the moon at a time, yet in photographs such as this one where both are visible, there is no sign of a camera. So who took the picture?
The fact of the matter is ... the cameras were mounted to the astronauts' chests, said astronomer Phil Plait, author of the award-winning blog Bad Astronomy and president of the James Randi Educational Foundation.
In the picture above, Plait notes, "you can see [Neil's] arms are sort of at his chest. That's where the camera is. He wasn't holding it up to his visor."
(Also see restored 1960s moon pictures from unmanned orbiters.)
Published July 16, 2009
No Stars Visible
Photograph courtesy NASA
"My God, it's full of stars!" Arthur C. Clarke's 2001 character Dave Bowman famously exclaimed when faced with the vastness of space.
You can tell Apollo was faked because ... the astronauts made no such exclamation while on the moon, and the black backgrounds of their photographs are curiously devoid of stars. (See more iconic space pictures.)
The fact of the matter is ... the moon's surface reflects sunlight, and that glare would have made stars difficult to see. Also, the astronauts photographed their lunar adventures using fast exposure settings, which would have limited incoming background light.
"They were taking pictures at 1/150th or 1/250th of a second," Bad Astronomy's Plait said. "In that amount of time, stars just don't show up."
(Related: Hear a 1969 audio history of the space age, including the Apollo 11 moon landing.)
Published July 16, 2009
No Landing Crater
Photograph courtesy NASA
The lunar lander known as the Eagle rests peacefully on the moon's surface in a picture taken mere hours after the July 20, 1969, moon landing.
You can tell Apollo was faked because ... the module is shown sitting on relatively flat, undisturbed soil. According to skeptics, the lander's descent should have been accompanied by a large dust cloud and would have formed a noticeable crater. (Explore an interactive moon map.)
The fact of the matter is ... the lander's engines were throttled back just before landing, and it did not hover long enough to form a crater or kick up much dust, the Smithsonian's Launius said.
"Science fiction movies depict this big jet of fire coming out as [spacecraft] land, but that's not how they did it on the moon," he added. "That's not the way they would do it now or anytime in the future."
(Related: new, high-res moon pictures from NASA orbiter launched in 2009.)
Published July 16, 2009
Photograph courtesy NASA
A moon-landing picture shows astronaut Buzz Aldrin standing on the footpad of the Eagle's ladder, his bent knees suggesting that he's about to jump up to the next rung. (Read "Buzz Aldrin, First Man (to Pee) on the Moon, Sounds Off.")
You can tell Apollo was faked because ... Aldrin is seen in the shadow of the lander, yet he is clearly visible. Hoax subscribers say that many shadows look strange in Apollo pictures. Some shadows don't appear to be parallel with each other, and some objects in shadow appear well lit, hinting that light was coming from multiple sources—suspiciously like studio cameras.
The fact of the matter is ... there were multiple light sources, Launius said. "You've got the sun, the Earth's reflected light, light reflecting off the lunar module, the spacesuits, and also the lunar surface."
It's also important to note that the lunar surface is not flat, he added. "If an object is in a dip, you're going to get a different shadow compared to an object next to it that is on a level surface."
Published July 16, 2009
Footprints Too Clear
Photograph courtesy NASA
The contrasted lines of a bootprint appear as Buzz Aldrin lifts his foot to record an image for studying the moon's soil properties. Apollo pictures show scores of clear bootprints left behind as the astronauts traipsed across the moon. (Find out more about moon exploration.)
You can tell Apollo was faked because ... the astronauts' prints are a bit too clear for being made on a bone-dry world. Prints that well defined could only have been made in wet sand.
The fact of the matter is ... that's nonsense, said Bad Astronomy's Plait. Moon dust, or regolith, is "like a finely ground powder. When you look at it under a microscope, it almost looks like volcanic ash. So when you step on it, it can compress very easily into the shape of a boot." And those shapes could stay pristine for a long while thanks to the airless vacuum on the moon.
(Related video: "Abandoned McDonald's Serves Restored NASA Moon Pictures.")
Published July 16, 2009
Photograph courtesy NASA
When Armstrong and Aldrin took off from the moon in July 1969, they left behind part of the Eagle, the U.S. flag, and several other instruments and mementos, including the seismometer Aldrin is adjusting in the above picture.
You can tell Apollo was faked because ... with instruments such as the Hubble Space Telescope capable of peering into the distant recesses of the universe, surely scientists should be able to see the various objects still on the moon. But no such pictures of these objects exist.
The fact of the matter is ... no telescope on Earth or in space has that kind of resolving power. "You can calculate this," Plait said. "Even with the biggest telescope on Earth, the smallest thing you can see on the surface of moon is something bigger than a house."
Published July 16, 2009
Photograph courtesy NASA
Strange patterns of light partially obscure the upper left part of a picture of Buzz Aldrin setting up a foil sheet for collecting solar particles near the Eagle.
You can tell Apollo was faked because ... those mysterious reflections come from studio lights on a production set.
The fact of the matter is ... it's highly unlikely NASA would make such an obvious blunder if they had spent millions of dollars to fake the moon landing, Plait said.
"Okay, let's take a step back. NASA's going to release a picture showing studio lights? Hello!" The odd lights in the picture are simply lens flares," he said. "There's a big fat pentagonal one right in the middle that is from the aperture of the camera itself."
Published July 16, 2009
I believe the moon landing was also fake. We did not have the technology then, and we don't now. That is why we haven't been "back" since - because we were never there. And now they say they have 'proof' with hi-def photos showing the landing spot, footprints & the flag knocked over from the blasters when taking off. Just writing that sentence is so laughable it's amazing more people can't see through the bogus story. These photos were simply Photoshopped. - it doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
I knew this whole scam before watching this movie, but the film basically shows exactly how the Government faked it. The entire 'landing' & photos were taken in a studio. Watch "Capricorn One". It's from 1977 & it's somewhat hard to find, and I can't say how accurate the whole thing was set-up from start to finish. If this topic is of interest to you (which if you are reading this, it is of interest) I HIGHLY recommend watching this film. From the moonscape studio, to the slow motion (i.e. fake gravity) by slowing down the frame rate. And, then, of course we have the audio with the nice speech "one step for mankind, etc" was transmitted from wherever the studio was (to keep all if the lies in one place, as not to endanger their phony mission. The images then sent to NASA from the 'landing spot on the moon' were simply transmitted from the studio, so indeed the people working for NASA monitoring the mission most likely believed the audio & video coming back was real.
I believe most likely the only people involved in lying to the world re: the fake landing are indeed the fake astronauts, the people who built the studio & handled the transmission to NASA, and most likely some very high-ups (President, Generals, Head of Nasa, etc) who kept the whole scam in check. I know this saying, and probably most of you have heard it as well. It goes like this: "if you tell a lie long enough - it starts to become the truth." That's what we have here. A big fat lie.
There are lots of debates about the fake moon landing. I am proud to say I am one of those who don't believe that moon landing ever happened in 1969. Lots of documentaries have been created about this issues.
Just see this video and you will know what I am talking about:
I hope you will like it and clear this dilemma ones for all time.
I remember watching in awe on TV back home in the UK of the Apollo11 mission in 1969.
Much later I read all the stuff about the 1st manned moon landing being a fake.
I think that alleged statement by Stanley Kirbrick is a load of crap.
Do you really think that ALL of the people engaged in the creation of this "hoax" were somehow kept silent or bumped off!! - I don`t think so. Where is the statements of the film crew, the sound crew, the set designers etc etc.
For me, the dodgy part goes back to JFK`s statement back in the early sixties when he stated "we shall go to the moon by the end of this decade..." a comment to reassure the American people (& us Brits by the way), that the Russians were not going to win the space race & be in a prominent position to blow us all to kingdom come.
In 1969, something had to be done a bit quick... & there were fatal accidents - in achieving it - but they did it.
Check out the sophisticated telescope shots of the landing area - the gears still there!!
If your an American & believe its all faked - shame on you mate.
Here is the truth about the moon landings: look up Youturbe, moon landing Kubrick and then this video: Dark Side of the Moon; Stanley Kurbrick and the fake moon landings. Made by the French in 2002 it interviews Nixon's cabinet people and advisers such as Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Haige and others WHO ADMITTED THAT THE FILMS OF THE FIRST MOON LANDING WERE MADE BY KUBRICK IN HIS STUDIO ON LONDON WHERE HE DID 2001. They also admitted that Nixon ordered the assassination of the film makers and four of them were killed.
this research regarding the photos shows you that the photos ARE REAL
You know it saddens me that so many people want to make claims that the moon landing is fake, that it never happened it's all Hollywood, their is no way that it could have or did happen and if this is true, than all this stuff that is going on with Mars is fake too. I was born on that day of July 21, 1969. That is such a special day for me and when I see all of this stuff, it's almost like people are taking that away from me.
You know it gets old hearing of people making claims that the couldn't land on the moon because their is no way possible for man at that time to succeed to do this, or other people making comments about other things, why aren't people living on the moon, with all of the things that go on in space and we have earth why would anyone want to live on the moon? Don't you think it would be kind of hard, with no water, etc, if the moon landing is so fake, than so are the things that are going on with Mars, I was born on that day July 21, 1969, my mom remembers it all too well, and it is just so sad when so many people want to make that claim that it was all fake. Since so many people think this, I take it you were there than? You were there when the astronauts made this trip and risked their own lives
Its fake because had man really landed on the moon 40 years ago, by now he should have started a colony out there. Why havent there been more manned explorations? Very unlike human nature, to stop explorations after 1 or 2 "successful" trips. After conquering the Everest, there have been innumerable "conquests", by ladies, by the visually impaired, even by the physically handicapped!! So what stops man from going to the moon again? Especially with the leaps and bounds in communication and technology that have taken place in the last 40 years!
Well, it's fake because I don't have a clue how they did that, so it must be faked, because I never studied physics or astronomy or rocket science, or tried to read any books or take any classes about science, or technology, or read up about lunar landings, so I will just make up stuff in my head, because it's so hard to comprehend how people can actually be smarter than me. So yes, it's a total fake. Yeah. Right. Yeah. And I don't trust the goverment either, so yeah, it's fake. I'll go back to eatin' my french fried taters. Mmm hmm.
OK folks, very easy : there are no airports on the moon.The surface is totally uneven.- No one would have taken the risk to send two brave men there, hoping that by chance their module would finally stand more or less upright.
The risk simply was too high.-The thing could have fallen down a crater.-Imagine the scenario of 2 men starving on the moon instead of turning into heroes.- Impossible and unthinkable.
I work in a restaurant in Houston, and spoke with a NASA Rocket Scientist several weeks ago. I asked him if we can pass through the Van Allen Belt ....He laughed and said no. Simple.The Earth is surrounded By the Van Allen Radiation Belt.I posted this comment yesterday on Gizmodo , And It was removed within minutes. Why?
And the Soviet Union, with its equipment designed to detect any missile the U.S. launched to make sure it wasn't an attack, decided to go along with the hoax?
just wondering why the shadows of the flag are opposite of the rest of the shadows. and any good conspiracy is one where no one believes that the conspiracy can exist while the actions point to all the reason it does exist. ask a kennedy assassination witness how government conspiracies worked for them. btw america had everything to gain through possibly faking this landing. the us and ussr were in the midst of the cold war. technology went well beyond the launch of the rocket. if you proved to the american people that we went to the moon, no one would object to the absurd funding spent on nasa. it drew americans closer together and made this country whole following the kennedy killings. kind of sounds like the same patriotic bs spoon fed to the public after 9-11. look at the trillions we spent on what? we killed the 2 leaders we put into position but yet terrorism continues to this very day. odd that afghanistan is a large supplier of poppies and heroin in this country is out of control. kind of sounds like vietnam all over again. and of course government "experts" will dispute everything conspirators believe. that is their job. see how easy it all is if you just stop to think a little outside the box instead of eating off the spoon that feeds you the bs daily.
What about this then? After moon landing it too seems possible that NASA has faked few hubble images? Any explanation on this?
Irony: People who insist the government can't do anything right believe they have kept the most massive conspiracy in all of human history a secret for four decades. The cover up would be harder than actually going to the moon!
the moon is 300 thousand miles away ,,we have never been more than 400 mile from the earth ,,end of argument ,,,,,,, weve been lied too n those who believed for years still wont believe that they have been lied to cause it scares them ,,,,,:) it makes them feel insecure ,,any government who kills its own president is goin to lie about whatever s*** it can ,,,, neil armstrongs face said enough ????
Take a photo from the Lord of the Rings movie, explain me the shadows and tell me that the dragons are real. :)
Four and a half decades after the first landing, are these photographs the only proofs we have of man ever landing on the moon?
Science does not believe in fairy tails, only facts. And good to see the facts are at last coming out, mostly due to the whistle blowers at the time who wanted this hoax to be exposed , had they spoke up at the time needless to say the same faith would have happened to them as the ten others that mysteriously lost their lives. One example been the safety adviser Steve Barron who commissioned a report on the project in which stated chances of getting to the moon safely was 0.016% not to mention getting back. He and his family was killed in a tragic car crash. and the report never published.
More and more people now (69% of Americans ) now believe the moon landings ware a hoax.
So at this point in time the only ones that are been fooled is themselves!!!!
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." ~ Mark Twain
If the landings were faked, what was the motivation? We certainly didn't gain resources or territory. Sadly, too many people seem to be unable to derive truth from the evidence. To quote a friend of mine - "Don't bother me with the facts; I already know what I believe." The landings did happen and I'm proud to be from the country that achieved them.
@Pero Tosev sigh
@Michael Cohen Hey Michael, your post is rubbish and has no credibility what so ever. Just made up BS.
@Kanak Jinan Simple, there is nothing there for us on the moon. They have explored it and there is no purpose to explore it any further at the time. Better to spend the money toward other things of interest
@Kanak Jinan , Not fake. The sad truth is we got there largely by scientific dumb luck, if not accident. Your current cell phone has more computing power than their landing module did. Scientists did not quite believe Einstein's theory that space bends, and so calculated the trip based on old Newtonian physics. They were wrong, and many course corrections had to be quickly calculated (which proved Einstein right!). Since then, there has been a great "dumbing down" of America. Deliberate, some feel. (A stupid populace is easier to control and entertain.) The result: we are now a second class nation, and can never afford - either monetarily or intellectually - the great adventure of leaving the Earth. It will be up to other countries. Or even the State of California.
@Michael Juergen Gnaedig Fischer Actually, probes had already been sent to the moon to map the surface. Of course they knew which areas were relatively flat and suitable for landing. In fact, the Apollo 11 lunar module was manually flown in the last couple of hundred feet prior to touchdown, to enable it to land in a less boulder strewn area. Your ignorance is outstanding Michael, but typical of that shown by hoax nutters.
@Michael Juergen Gnaedig Fischer Read "The Right Stuff." These guys WANTED to take the risk. If they lived they would be heroes, if they died they would be heroes. The Cold War was raging. We were in a race against the Soviets. It was a matter of national pride and a badge of honor to even be chosen to be an astronaut. It was about winning and proving that we were the best. The space program basically stopped because 1. Lack of funding 2. President Kennedy died 3. Once it became obvious that there was nothing there to gain it seemed rather pointless to continue going back. If there was gold or oil up there you can bet we'd still be pursuing it.
@Michael Juergen Gnaedig Fischer You realise that the astronauts could actually 'fly' the lunar module in a similar way to that of a helicopter. This is exactly what Neil Armstrong did during the Apollo 11 landing to avoid a boulder field. Did you not know this Michael?
@Jim Snarker Do some internet research on the Van Allen Radiation Belts, and you might reduce your ignorance somewhat. Presently your knowledge is practically nil. Even Dr Van Allen himself has come out and stated that the belts are no huge barrier to travel outside earth's orbit. I bet you didn't know this Jim. Hoax nutters are only too happy to spread misinformation, and gullible idiots such as yourself are only too happy to snap it up, just like a hungry puppy to biscuits.
@Jim Snarker Look at the info in the following link, and you'll realise your rocket scientist knows nothing about the belts -
The relevant info starts about half way through the link page.
@Johnny Allen & Ilea Vazan true speak. most of the citizens do the defending for the government. people who question are "crazy" or "no patriotic". sorry if we don't like being lied to and are willing to ask for answers and better explanations. funny funny funny funny. we are not allowed back on the moon or we cannot go at all are my thoughts. i hope you will all have your own thoughts that you create based on questioning/reading/listening. not thoughts created for you.
@Johnny Allen The shadows of the flag are not opposite to the rest of the shadows at all. You're just another waste of space hoax nutter.
@Ed Cushing no. because people believe anything. not because they want to, but because of fear/poisoning/brainwash/intelligence/money/actors/puppets/patriotism/fabrications/distractions/etc....
@Karl Bensley well said
@Karl Bensley We didn't have the technology to fake it. Remember, this is 1969. Instgram didn't exist. Video editing was hard if not downright impossible.
@Martin Bishop better to exercise your rights and freedoms than take it in the mouth.
@Fred Mullins everything was the motivation kid. everything. world standing, economics, pride, budget, something to show for the tax money, technological advancement, accomplishment, taking humanity to a first time of leaving the planet, showing off, distraction from other government/illuminati conspiracies, etc.......etc......etc.........
@Fred Mullins what like killing kennedy too ??
Do some research into the sound studios in England at the time... film legend Stanley Kubrick was filming there at the time.. Space Odessey 2001... Other 'moon' movies were filmed there too. it is believed that , in order to fund his film, he staged photos for NASA and was held to secrecy. This is not so difficult to imagine. Even if the trip to the moon was successful, the photos taken there might not be so good. So, NASA had publicity photos taken at he soubnd stage in England. What is weird is this....later, and very telling, came The Shining (Stanley Kubrick) Look at the subtle background references. look into it, Stanley was telling us something. Artists need to speak, and they don't lie.
America and Russia were in the middle of the Cold War. Both terrified of the other, and determined to prove their superiority. The moon landing was the ultimate goal. Whoever got there first won! They started out firing rockets, then they achieved orbit in an empty rocket, then they sent up monkeys, dogs, etc, and eventually a man or two. All of a sudden they were landing on the moon. I suppose they could repeat the performance but modern opponents to the American system would not be as impressed by such a performance. They were also developing nuclear weapons thinking that the country that had the biggest and the most would be the safest. Bit like school bully thinking, really.
@Fred Mullins I believe money would be the motivation
@Fred Mullins What was the motivation? The motivation was to get recognition from the world and to pass an image of power, you know, Americans love to do this. And also to get more Americans like you, "proud to be from the only country that achieved it".
@Chris Carter nor about the space travel..Like it or not humans never went to the Moon it is impossible and here is the simple reason why : it is not possible to do land on and take off from the Moon and latter make a re-entry and land on Earth using a capsule (or Shuttle) after any space trip - you are going too fast and will simply burn up as you cannot brake or reduce speed in the strong gravity field pulling you down. Therefore only cosmo clownshave ever flown to the Moon or around Earth in space or visited the International Fake Station, IFS, orbiting Earth every 90 minutes. It is all a hoax. Quite fun actually.
People still believed that 18 US astronauts or cosmo clowns visited the Moon at six different occasions 1969-1972 and that 12 of them actually landed on the the ~200°C hot sunny Moon surface at six visits, some even bringing a little car along with rubber tyres, while the other six had to watch from orbit around Moon.
The US cosmo nuts or asstro clowns on the Moon survived as their space suits and shoes (!) were airconditioned. They did not understand that their shoes would melt, when touching the Moon surface. You cannot step on a 200° hot surface of any kind in vaccum without melting your protective gear and getting burnt.
During the day the temperature on the Moon can reach 253 Fahrenheit (123 Celsius), while at night it can drop to -387 Fahrenheit (-233 Celsius).Factswww.moonzoo.org/FAQ_MoonFacts
Most people do not understand that you have to eject mass in a precise direction to change speed up or down of a space ship, while getting lighter and lighter, and that you cannot carry sufficient mass with you for any trip.
Many persons today, 2014, are then curious about the mass or amount of fuel you need to fly to the Moon ... and back using 1960's or today's space ship technology and how much it costs and arrive at this popular web page visited by 1 000's of people. If you ask Google or any search engine, it will also direct you to plenty of nonsensical sites and web pages apparently supported by NASA providing confusing info. Why is that?
The answers are simple.
1. It is not possible to fly to the Moon and back (in spite of Wikipedia/ NASA suggesting otherwise) because you need, apart from a comfortable space ship with a very advanced steering system, a big mass of fuel/energy to do it using the best rocket engines available by the military very secret industry, but you cannot carry the mass of all the fuel with you, because you get too heavy.
2. You cannot even land on Earth again! The space ship brake system - a heat shield (LOL) for capsules or stunt flying backwards by invented US Shuttle pilots - does not work in the atmosphere. Earth gravity is much too strong and your speed too high. You or your mass including capsule or Shuttle will just go faster and faster whatever you try. No way you can brake at re-entry. Your mass and ass will burn up!
3. Any human in a space ship will immediately be fried to death due to heat radiation from the Sun and cosmic radiation. To insulate the space ship against radiation will make it too heavy. A space ship traveling between Earth and Moon is exposed 24/24 and 7/7 to the Sun, as if you were at the Equator of planet Earth but without any filtering, damping, turbulent atmosphere.Same applies to satellites orbiting Earth high above the atmosphere. They all heat up to ~200°C, when exposed to the Sun.
4. The cost to fly to the Moon is evidently prohibitive. Better fake it and pocket the money yourself.
5. You can probably create sending a small, unmanned spaceship to orbit the Moon after executing, automatically or by remote control, a very complex brake maneuver to get into Moon orbit at say 1 500 m/s speed and at 100 000 meters altitude (like Apollo 11), and then with with some complex sub-system land on the Moon (see right) after executing another, automatically or by remote control, extremely difficult brake and stop maneuver to get out of Moon orbit and get down and stop on the surface of the Moon at zero speed, but I assume not even the The People's Republic of China can manage it December 2013. The start rocket looks like a model. And the Moon lander unit (right) weight, single (!) rocket engine for steering and braking, fuel, control systems data, times of maneuver, etc. are unknown and you wonder, if it has been tested on planet Earth.
In films you can do better job than the Chinese Moon landing in 2013...It looks like stupid science fiction. The videos of the landing just shows the flat Moon surface coming closer and closer from 90° above. 100% nonsense. Those are the reasons why USA/NASA faked Moon trips six times in the 1960's and 1970's to impress ... and manipulate ... friends and foes.
"NASA is not going to the Moon with a human as a primary project probably in my lifetime, NASA chief clown Charles Bolden said" April 5, 2013, is simple joke. You cannot go there at all. You have never been there. But the show must go on.
@Elayna Sadorus @Fred Mullins Funny everything you say is from William Kare’s documentary (mockumentary?) Dark Side of the Moon, which originally aired on French TV channel Arte in 2002 as Opération Lune. that is a fake documentary meant to be a joke with clues throughout to prove how archive 'footage' and out of context statements can be sewed together to appear to be history. Most of the interviewees were actors reading script or original real characters in on a joke such as Christina Kubrick herself or footage of the likes of Kissinger and Alexander Haigh being interviewed about something totally different. For instance when Kissinger was shown saying he 'would do it all again', he was talking about the Vietnam war. At the end of the 'movie' is a bloopers reel SHOWING the actors flubbing their lines and messing up and laughing about it! It states that the whole thing was fictional in the credits. It even has Nixon sending 150,000 troops to kill four people that were present at the faked moon landing filming who went into hiding in Vietnam disguised as peasants. It is a farce, the whole Kubrick thing - made up joke. An yet somehow it has gone into the background of something someone heard about or saw and is now used as a source! Talk about do some research! Start with: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Side_of_the_Moon_(film)
And the watch the whole film at : http://dangerousminds.net/comments/stanley_kubrick_faked_the_apollo_11_moon_landing
if you want some laughs.
@Elayna Sadorus @Fred Mullins Nonsense, utter drivel! Kubrick had nothing to do with any of this. The technology was not there to fake it either, you obviously know nothing about cameras and camera lenses. Plenty of evidence for going to the moon. People believe any old conspiracy crap, makes them feel like they're on to something, a bit of excitement amongst the daily grind.
@Virginia Dare @Fred Mullins Well, the space program did make Teflon, Tang, and Velcro popular, but your "money" drone falls flat otherwise, because faking the program would cause such unfathomable, untold, catastrophic consequences for EVERYONE involved-- Boeing, Lockheed, DuPont, OUR WHOLE COUNTRY, etc. etc., ad infinitum-- if it were discovered that it could not possibly be worth the risk! Besides, "Three people can keep a secret--if two of them are dead" (B. Franklin), so how long do you think this "hoax" could have lasted with the THOUSANDS of people involved in it?
@Vini Almeida @Fred Mullins Weak motive. And jingoistic. On your part, not Mullins'. I am an American, and I do not "love to do this". They landed on the moon, picked up some rocks and dirt, and came back. So what? As thrilling as I think it was, I think the money could have been better spent on eliminating poverty and supporting social services and such, but I was only 9 when it happened and no one asked me. [:(
@Ilea Vazan @Chris Carter I'd like to say that I am not going to insult you but I would be lying if I said that. All I will say is that you are an idiot and that's the only answer that you deserve.
@Jon Hilderbrand @Virginia Dare @Fred Mullins That makes the most logical sense to me. Someone would have blown the whistle by now. Which is why I don't believe the government has ETs hidden underground somewhere. Most of the people spouting on here are not scientists or physicists so they don't know anything. I am not a science person but from everything I've read about the moon landing and the race for space it makes logical sense that we did indeed go to the moon. As for why we don't keep going there, there is no good reason now to do that.
the answer is in the quote you just used. i am confused on what statement you are making though........public relations comes to mind
you are totally right about the money being spent on better things. this is another reason why things must change, because 'the powers that be' don't give a shit about anyone but investors and wealthy people who seek more wealth at any cost.
traveling to the moon and picking up rocks is hardly a "so what" kind of event. it would provide such a boost to america, that the would seem untouchable to the rest of the world. dominance through fear, a bully strategy that must end. we listen to you defend it and feel sorry you are too afraid to even consider it being a hoax (or any other lie).
@Jon Hilderbrand @Vini Almeida @Fred Mullins the money was spent on drugs n parties the moon was an excuse ,,,90million on three moon buggies ha ,,fooled ,,it was made into a soap opera ,,and the people bought it the money wasnt wasted in space ,,no one went anywhere ,,think about it ,,it was a front