National Geographic Daily News
6 comments
Robert Fouts
Robert Fouts

      The problem with these blogs is that there is no space for proper explanations or good science, but only bad grammer.

     I have probably met an talked to Mr. Aldrin more than once as a neighbor. Sombody once told Mr. Aldrin that the moon landing was a fake and he became very upset over the issue. The incident was never in the press. That is one point of confirmation.

    The secoond point of confirmation is that the LEM was pre-engineered for a subjective acceleration of exactly 2 lunar gravities. Since the unscientific blogger world is unaware of the applicable applied principle, if the landing was a fake there would be no reason to mention the specific thrust. There point 2 confirms the landing. 

Danial Aziz
Danial Aziz

As the quality of the time not so up, the camera is brought in the moon to capture the pictures are not so clear, so that star images are not shown

Danial Aziz
Danial Aziz

The moon reflects the sun to the earth, so the picture looks shine Buzz Aldrin.

Danial Aziz
Danial Aziz

What do scientists use when want to see waste in moon? Please tell me.  If scientists use telescopes, are very unlikely to see Apollo leftovers on the moon.

Danial Aziz
Danial Aziz

I see, Neil Armstrong are capturing Buzz Aldrin pictures using a camera attached to his chest

Danial Aziz
Danial Aziz

If you see apollo video, the flag is not wave, but just folded only.

Trending News

News Blogs

Newsletters

Connect With Nat Geo

Shop National Geographic

    SHOP NOW »

    Sustainable Earth

    More »