Corruption Top Threat to African Animals, Study Says

Stefan Lovgren
for National Geographic News
November 5, 2003

A new study shows that political corruption and bad governance, rather than human population pressures and poverty, may present the greatest threat to wildlife in developing countries.

The researchers found that high levels of corruption in African countries strongly correlate with declining elephant and black rhinoceros populations.

"The most corrupt countries are the least successful at protecting their important species and habitats," said Bob Smith of the Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology at the University of Kent in England, who led the study. "Money that's earmarked for anti-poaching and conservation programs often ends up in the pockets of corrupt officials instead."

The most corrupt countries in Africa also have the richest biodiversity, according to the study, which is described in this week's issue of the science journal Nature.

But the news is not all bad. The researchers suggest that governments can tackle corruption and improve conservation by involving the private sector.

That's already happening in Kenya, where a two-year-old private consortium, the Mara Conservancy, which manages almost half of the famous Masai Mara game reserve, has stamped out graft and virtually ended poaching.

Poor Governance, Rich Wildlife

The study used so-called Corruption Perception Index scores provided by the international non-profit organization Transparency International. In 2003, that list ranked Bangladesh as the most corrupt country in the world, followed by Nigeria and Haiti.

Many African countries with a rich biodiversity, such as Cameroon, Kenya, Uganda, Republic of Congo and Zimbabwe, were also found to be highly corrupt.

The corruption scores were then measured against three well-surveyed components of biodiversity: African elephants, black rhinoceroses, and forest cover. Elephant and rhino populations both declined dramatically in the 1980s due to rampant poaching, before recovering in the 1990s.

"We looked at a range of factors, including human population density and poverty levels, but we found that the factor which best explained the changes in the numbers of elephants and rhinos was corruption levels," said Smith.

Bribery of wildlife officials to allow poaching to take place may not be as prevalent as it once was. "The biggest problem is that conservation money just isn't going where it's supposed to be spent," said Smith.

Continued on Next Page >>


SOURCES AND RELATED WEB SITES

ADVERTISEMENT

EMAIL NEWSLETTERPhotos and News of the Week

Get the top photos and news of the week from National Geographic News, plus occasional breaking-news alerts.   See Sample >>
Please enter a valid email address
Thank You! Subscription accepted. An email confirmation will be sent.
Privacy Policy

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC'S PHOTO OF THE DAY

NEWS FEEDS     After installing a news reader, click on this icon to download National Geographic News's XML/RSS feed.   After installing a news reader, click on this icon to download National Geographic News's XML/RSS feed.

Get our news delivered directly to your desktop—free.
How to Use XML or RSS

Who Should Get $20,000?

Who do you want to see receive funding to put their Earth-saving idea into action? Check out the ten Green Effect finalists, and from July 7-20 you can vote—up to once a day—for your favorite idea!
Click here to get 12 months of National Geographic Magazine for $15.