|
|
|
|
Also see: Today's Top Stories
|
|
|
ON THE TRAIL OF NABOKOV'S 'BLUES'
Think of butterflies and elegant creatures come to mind. Fritillaries with gaudy silver spangles, or kite-like swallowtails with their trailing wings. In the flashy, fancy world of butterflies, the great masses of dowdy “true blues” are so common that most people overlook them. |
|
|||||
![]() |
|
But blues fascinate butterfly experts with their mind-boggling
complexity. Novelist Vladimir Nabokov was obsessed with
blues, and included references to them in his works.
A huge group of tiny, lookalike butterflies, blues are found on every continent but Antarctica. Some 1,400 species live in a variety of habitats ranging from beach dunes to high mountain slopes, typically in small colonies. PIECES OF THE SKY Known scientifically as Polyommatini, true blues are named for the flashy iridescent blue on the topsides of males—not truly blue but the effect of colorless, prism-shaped scales reflecting blue to our eyes. Poet Robert Frost described blues as “sky flakes.” But the blue is a rare sight. Males sit watch on their territories most of the time with their wings up, exposing the drab surface beneath. Females don’t have reflecting scales. The black spots on the underwings of both sexes tend to make them look like gray construction-paper triangles sprinkled with pepper. The excitement among blues experts these days is about finding new species, the equivalent of the Holy Grail in the world of biological sciences. The current hot spot is the high Andes of tropical South America, where until recently blues were thought to not be widespread.
Seventy new South American blues have been discovered within the last decade, in part because of a reevaluation of pioneering research Nabokov did on a small collection blue specimens while writing fiction a half-century ago. “We expect to find more in the great mountain ranges of China,” says Johnson, noting that until recently the region was closed to researchers. LOSING GROUND As more new species are brought back, they are added to hundreds that have been sitting in museum drawers for decades, awaiting classification. The delay is a complicated issue, but it’s due mainly to the difficulty of distinguishing one blue from another. “They don’t conform to our idea of species,” says Robert Robbins, an entomologist with the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C. Some blues that are considered the same species won’t mate, but some believed to be different species will. One blue is often so similar to another that they can be distinguished only by comparisons of microscopic anatomical parts. The debates keep things interesting for people who work among drawers of specimens. But the real concern is how quickly blues are disappearing. Their characteristically small colonies, increasingly isolated by development, have made the group particularly vulnerable.
Worldwide, the list grows as well. The World Conservation Union (IUCN) has published a monograph on conserving the world’s blues, noting endangered species in England, France, Italy, Spain, Hungary, Russia, Greece, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Turkey, and Asia Minor. “It’s the same in South America,” says Johnson. “Almost as fast as we’re finding them, we’re finding out they are in trouble.” Eye in the Sky is a weekly series that brings you the story behind the headlines using satellite imagery, remote sensing, aerial photography, and maps. This feature is developed by National Geographic News with the sponsorship of the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and Earth-Info. Check out maps and imagery at http://www.earth-info.org.
|
|
|||||||||||||||