ILLUSTRATION BY JET PROPULSION LABORATORY/NASA
Published June 30, 2014
NASA's newest spacecraft, the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2, aims to map the amount of carbon dioxide—the big gorilla of greenhouse gases—in the skies of its home planet.
Scheduled for a July 1 launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, the $475 million mission replaces the first Orbiting Carbon Observatory, lost during launch in 2009 in a mishap that planted it in the ocean off Antarctica.
"We're excited about this opportunity to finally complete some unfinished business," said the spacecraft team's Ralph Basilio of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. "It was heartbreaking to lose the first mission."
The new spacecraft, OCO-2, an upgraded version of the lost one, will essentially re-map atmospheric carbon dioxide once every 16 days with 99.7 percent accuracy. (Related: "Federal Climate Change Report Highlights Risks for Americans.")
The launch follows the Obama administration's proposed Clean Air Act regulations, which seek to curb carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, and comes as international negotiators look ahead to a United Nations climate meeting in Paris. (Related: "Dire UN Climate Reports Raise Questions About Global Willpower.")
OCO-2 is NASA's first carbon dioxide tracking satellite, launched as Japan's less capable Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) reaches the end of its five-year mission.
When the first OCO mission crashed, engineers presented plans for a replacement mission to NASA within days. The delay in launching the new orbiter came from picking a new rocket after NASA canceled an initial contract for a relaunch on a Taurus rocket, the same kind that failed in 2009.
"The spacecraft is not quite a carbon copy" of the original mission, says Basilio, though he notes that most of the team remains from the first mission. A third mission, OCO-3, might put similar carbon tracking instruments on the International Space Station. However, OCO-3 is on hold, awaiting funding.
From an altitude of 438 miles (705 kilometers), the satellite will measure where the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere comes from and where it ends up.
The spacecraft will "watch the Earth breathe," says NASA's Betsy Edwards, who heads the mission management at NASA headquarters.
The spacecraft will map the entire globe's carbon dioxide to a resolution within 1.2 square miles (3 square kilometers). Industrial emissions will be depicted in shades of red, while uptake by forests in such places as the Amazon will be shown in shades of green.
Carbon dioxide traps heat in the atmosphere; without it Earth's average surface temperature would be below freezing. But its concentration in the atmosphere now measures about 400 parts per million, a 42 percent increase since the start of the industrial revolution. Burning fossil fuels, such as oil, gas, and coal, and making cement has largely driven the increase.
"Some of the big stationary sources," such as coal-fired power plants, "will certainly stand out," says JPL scientist Mike Gunson. "Larger urban areas and manufacturers we will certainly see."
Some of the carbon dioxide that humanity releases disappears every year, absorbed by the ocean or by plants. "Roughly half of the carbon dioxide we emit is taken out of the atmosphere every year," Gunson says.
The leftover gas has built up in the atmosphere and is the biggest driver in the global warming seen over the past century, an increase of about one degree Fahrenheit (0.6 degrees Celsius), according to NASA. It has also led to a roughly 30 percent increase in the acidity of the oceans over that time, a threat to coral, oysters, and other marine life.
Currently, scientists rely on about 160 ground stations to monitor carbon dioxide levels, leaving big areas of the globe unmonitored, including India, Africa, South America, and the oceans.
That means scientists don't know where all the carbon dioxide is coming from or where it goes, Gunson says. "We'd like to look at the rain forests, which are thought to play a big role in the carbon cycle," as carbon is locked away by plant life as it grows and released when it dies.
Carbon dioxide persists in the atmosphere for centuries, unlike other greenhouse gases, such as methane. If politicians are going to create programs to cut carbon dioxide emissions, offering cash "credits" for reductions, for example, then tracking emissions from satellites like OCO-2 will make such agreements easier to enforce, NASA suggests.
The first carbon observer failed when the clamshell-shaped housing on its launch rocket failed to fall away from the satellite in orbit. The extra weight dragged the spacecraft back to Earth. The failure had four possible causes, including an electrical failure or a snagged cord. Hunting down the exact reason and fixing it to recertify the Taurus rocket for flight looked as if it would be too costly to justify the expense, one of the reasons that NASA went with a different rocket.
That failure was an expensive one in both time and money, says Edwards. The replacement orbiter cost about $275 million and the new rocket, a Delta II, cost $200 million.
The launch will carry OCO-2 to an orbit that will allow it to travel around the Poles once every 99 minutes, in formation with the "A-Train" international suite of five other Earth-observing satellites that measure clouds, rain, snow, and other atmospheric gases.
"We feel really confident about the spacecraft," Basilio says, citing recent JPL tests of the instruments that will be aboard.
During a mission scheduled for just two years due to tight budgets, the satellite should take more than one million measurements, he says.
Follow Dan Vergano on Twitter.
Well put Jeff. I would also like to know if the information from the satellite will be available to the general public? I think it would have a greater impact if the public had the ability to see for itself exactly where it's coming from and where it is being absorbed. Then we could use that information to make the money we spend talk for itself. For example, we could see if a manufacturer is a big carbon source and use that information accordingly. I think this kind of information should be available to everyone who wants it since it is our taxes that are paying for it!
By the way Jeff, you don't happen to live in Maryland do you? I have a Friend that lives there.
It's all fine and good that we a launching this satellite.
More importantly we should be concentrating on what we are going to do about the CO2 that we are consistently pumping into the atmosphere. Looking at it, pondering it, arguing about it and pointing fingers is not getting the job done. We are running out of time, if we have not already done so.
It's akin to finding a cancer and sitting back to see what develops, diagnosing, discussing alternatives and deciding who is going to pay for the operation,before you know it, too late.
Do we want to be too late and leave it to our Children to deal with the Earth's tumor, "Greenhouse gases" in particular CO2? I think not!
@Dwayne LaGrou No fellow, reside in NJ. Getting close to retirement and my wife and I are probably headed out West. The Northeast ain't what it used to be in more ways than one. I guess that can be said for anywhere, but we are ready for a change.
The Major CO2 contributors today, China and India, that much is known. My understanding is they are both pumping far more CO2 into the atmosphere than the US has when it was at its worst. We are still major contributors, but have been at least reducing our emissions, though not quickly enough and still way too much.
The World as a whole must address this issue, or else we be in trouble. That's a big part of the problem, when has the, "World" cooperated, in earnest, to get anything done. The divisions are widening not getting smaller. It's a mess.
Well, Good luck in you're upcoming retirement, And I know what you mean with all of the CO2 being pumped out now, What will the Earth be like for our kids and their children and Grandchildren.
@Dwayne LaGrou Thanks Dwayne, wish you and yours all the Best.
Hopefully, some day soon, Humanity will wake up and see how ridiculous things have gotten in the world today.If most of the negative energy, the arguing and hate being expended all over, was changed to positive energy, what a wonderful world it would be.
Fracking for shale oil has boosted U.S. oil production to near-record levels. But the industry faces two challenges: low prices and low reserves.
Breeding the remaining northern white rhinoceroses with their cousins may preserve some of their genes, scientists say.
A steady trickle of water is bringing wildlife back to a few parts of the Colorado River Delta.
The Future of Food
How do we feed nine billion people by 2050, and how do we do so sustainably?
We've made our magazine's best stories about the future of food available in a free iPad app.